Don't waste the crisis: The COVID-19 Anthropause as an experiment for rethinking human-environment relations

被引:1
作者
Fiske, Amelia [1 ]
Radhuber, Isabella M. [2 ]
Salvador, Consuelo Fernandez [3 ]
Araujo, Emilia Rodrigues [4 ]
Jasser, Marie [5 ,6 ]
Saxinger, Gertrude [7 ]
Zimmermann, Bettina M. [1 ,8 ]
Prainsack, Barbara [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Hist & Eth Med, TUM Sch Med & Hlth, Dept Clin Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Polit Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ San Francisco, Coll Social Sci & Humanities, Quito, Ecuador
[4] Univ Minho, Inst Social Sci, Braga, Portugal
[5] Univ Vienna, Dept Int Dev, Vienna, Austria
[6] Univ Nur, Inst Sci & Social Res, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
[7] Univ Bern, Inst Social Anthropol, Bern, Switzerland
[8] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Environment; socio-political change; climate change; crisis; COVID-19; anthropause; pandemic; Europe; Latin America;
D O I
10.1177/25148486231221017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic sparked radical changes in the way life was lived around the globe. With the rapid reduction in human mobility, short-term environmental improvements were seen across the world. Work and social routines were altered, and political action to reduce case numbers seemed to open a window of opportunity for socio-environmental change in a post-pandemic world. Inspired by conversations around the "COVID-19 Anthropause," this paper probes the lived experiences and reflections that emerged in the pandemic pause. Three years after the onset of the pandemic, many initial environmental gains have been limited. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 Anthropause has brought human-environment relations into new light, sparking introspection and forms of broader social critique surrounding what kinds of socio-political courage and structural change is necessary to achieve new post-pandemic realities. Our research shows the heterogeneity of experiences of the Anthropause, highlighting the ways that uncritical engagement with the concept can obscure overlapping structural inequalities, and reinforce harmful binaries around the presence and absence of humans in nature. Drawing on longitudinal, qualitative data from Latin America and Europe, we enrich debates over the implications of the pandemic for human-environment relations and underscore the need to attend to radical forms of difference amid any global environmental concept.
引用
收藏
页码:1222 / 1244
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Agencia IPS, 2022, DEBER BOLIVIA 0221
  • [2] Bolivia's Net Zero path: Investment needs, challenges, and opportunities
    Andersen, Lykke E.
    Gonzales, Luis E.
    Malky, Alfonso
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2022, 4
  • [3] Anthes E., 2022, New York Times
  • [4] Bambra Clare, 2021, The Unequal Pandemic: COVID-19 and Health Inequalities
  • [5] The bad environmentalism of 'nature is healing' memes
    Bosworth, Kai
    [J]. CULTURAL GEOGRAPHIES, 2022, 29 (03) : 353 - 374
  • [6] Carstens P., WAS MACHT CORONA UMW
  • [7] Castro M., 2020, NOTICIAS AMBIEN 0407
  • [8] The Politics of Climate Change Is More Than the Politics of Capitalism
    Chakrabarty, Dipesh
    [J]. THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2017, 34 (2-3) : 25 - 37
  • [9] Charmaz K., 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory
  • [10] Cuevas A., 2020, RAZON NOTICIAS 0404