How Useful Are Tax Disclosures in Predicting Effective Tax Rates? A Machine Learning Approach

被引:2
作者
Guenther, David A. [1 ]
Peterson, Kyle [1 ]
Searcy, Jake [2 ]
Williams, Brian M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Lundquist Coll Business, Sch Accounting, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Data Sci, Inst Fundamental Sci, Eugene, OR USA
[3] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Kelley Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
analyst forecast; machine learning; artificial intelligence; explainable AI; effective tax rate; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; ANALYSTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; STATEMENTS; COMPLEXITY; ACCESS; IMPACT; INCOME;
D O I
10.2308/TAR-2021-0398
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate (1) how well a machine learning algorithm can predict one-year ahead effective tax rates (ETRs) and (2) which items in the financial statements and notes are most useful for these predictions. We compare our machine-generated ETR predictions with those from ETRs implied by analysts' earnings forecasts and find the algorithm's predictions are less biased, more precise, and explain more of the variance in future ETRs. We then use Explainable AI (based on Shapley values) to measure the usefulness of each disclosure item in the algorithm's predictions. We find that while some tax-related items are useful, others offer minimal value. Using the machine learning algorithm's use of information as a benchmark, we then further use Shapley values to examine which information is underweighted or overweighted by analysts. Overall, our results help inform standard setters on the relevance of certain tax disclosures in achieving the objective of predicting future ETRs.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 322
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Tax Specific versus Generic Accounting-Based Textual Analysis and the Relationship with Effective Tax Rates: Building Context
    Allen, Eric
    O'Leary, Daniel E.
    Qu, Hao
    Swenson, Charles W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 35 (02) : 115 - 147
  • [2] Amir E., 1999, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V16, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00572.x
  • [3] Anand V., 2019, PREDICTING PROFITABI, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3466478, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3466478]
  • [4] Biased Auctioneers
    Aubry, Mathieu
    Kraussl, Roman
    Manso, Gustavo
    Spaenjers, Christophe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023, 78 (02) : 795 - 833
  • [5] Baugess S., 2017, 19 ANN OP RISK N AM
  • [6] Bauman M., 2005, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, V27, P57, DOI DOI 10.2308/JATA.2005.27.2.57
  • [7] Street versus GAAP: Which Effective Tax Rate Is More Informative?
    Beardsley, Erik L.
    Mayberry, Michael A.
    McGuire, Sean T.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (02) : 1310 - 1340
  • [8] Belnap A., 2022, Working paper
  • [9] Pre-Empting Disclosure? Firms' Decisions Prior to FIN No. 48
    Blouin, Jennifer L.
    Gleason, Cristi A.
    Mills, Lillian F.
    Sikes, Stephanie A.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2010, 85 (03) : 791 - 815
  • [10] Forecasting Taxes: New Evidence from Analysts
    Bratten, Brian
    Gleason, Cristi A.
    Larocque, Stephannie A.
    Mills, Lillian F.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (03) : 1 - 29