Assessment of state-of-practice use of field liquefaction charts at low and high overburden using centrifuge experiments

被引:4
作者
El-Sekelly, Waleed [1 ,3 ]
Dobry, Ricado [2 ]
Abdoun, Tarek [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Dept Struct Eng, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Eng, 110 8 th St,JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[3] New York Univ Abu Dhabi, POB 129188, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sand liquefaction; Centrifuge testing; Liquefaction charts; High overburden pressure; LOTUNG DOWNHOLE ARRAY; SOIL LIQUEFACTION; DETERMINISTIC ASSESSMENT; SHEAR; RESISTANCE; SANDS; CPT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106952
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Practical application of the state of practice field liquefaction charts at low and high overburden is assessed with centrifuge testing. Available results of four centrifuge experiments of a 5 m-thick clean sand layer having free drainage at the top are used as case histories. The centrifuge tests include relative densities of 45% and 80% and overburden pressures of about 1 atm and 6 atm. The shear wave velocity (Vs) was measured in the centrifuge models using bender elements. The cone penetration testing (CPT) tip resistance was estimated with correlations from the literature. Vs-based and CPT-based liquefaction charts proposed by Andrus and Stokoe (2000) and Idriss and Boulanger (2008) were used. Both liquefaction charts worked well for the centrifuge tests having an effective overburden, sigma'v0, of about 1 atm. This was expected as the charts were originally calibrated with field earthquake case histories having sigma'v0 < 2 atm. Both liquefaction charts are too conservative for the centrifuge tests having an effective overburden, sigma'v0 of about 6 atm. The agreement at 6 atm deteriorates even further when state-of-practice overburden correction factors, K sigma < 1 are applied, including a prediction of liquefaction when the measured maximum pore pressure ratio in the test was only 0.6. Values of K sigma > 1 were found to provide good agreement with the charts for the 6 atm tests.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. II: Additional Interpretation [J].
Abdoun, T. ;
Ni, M. ;
Dobry, R. ;
Zehtab, K. ;
Marr, A. ;
El-Sekelly, W. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (09)
[2]   Centrifuge and Large-Scale Modeling of Seismic Pore Pressures in Sands: Cyclic Strain Interpretation [J].
Abdoun, T. ;
Gonzalez, M. A. ;
Thevanayagam, S. ;
Dobry, R. ;
Elgamal, A. ;
Zeghal, M. ;
Mercado, V. M. ;
El Shamy, U. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (08) :1215-1234
[3]   Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity [J].
Andrus, RD ;
Stokoe, KH .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 126 (11) :1015-1025
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Report UCD/CGM-10/02
[5]   Liquefaction case histories from the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, New Zealand - Insights from an extensive CPT dataset and paleo-liquefaction trenching [J].
Bastin, Sarah ;
van Ballegooy, Sjoerd ;
Mellsop, Nick ;
Wotherspoon, Liam .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2020, 271
[6]  
Boulanger R, 2015, UCDCGM1501 CTR GEOT
[7]   CPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedure [J].
Boulanger, Ross W. ;
Idriss, I. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (02)
[8]   Probabilistic Standard Penetration Test-Based Liquefaction-Triggering Procedure [J].
Boulanger, Ross W. ;
Idriss, I. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (10) :1185-1195
[9]   High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses [J].
Boulanger, RW .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 129 (12) :1071-1082
[10]  
Boulanger RW, 2004, P 11 INT C SOIL DYN