A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Mapping Tree Species Using WorldView-2 Imagery in the Agroforestry Landscape of West Africa

被引:8
作者
Usman, Muhammad [1 ]
Ejaz, Mahnoor [2 ]
Nichol, Janet E. [3 ]
Farid, Muhammad Shahid [2 ]
Abbas, Sawaid [1 ,4 ]
Khan, Muhammad Hassan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Punjab, Ctr Geog Informat Syst, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
[2] Univ Punjab, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
[3] Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Dept Geog, Brighton BN1 9RH, England
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Land Surveying & Geoinformat, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
agroforestry; machine learning; Sudano-Sahelian; tree species mapping; WorldView-2; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; VEGETATION INDEXES; RANDOM FOREST; CLASSIFICATION; REFLECTANCE; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi12040142
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Farmland trees are a vital part of the local economy as trees are used by farmers for fuelwood as well as food, fodder, medicines, fibre, and building materials. As a result, mapping tree species is important for ecological, socio-economic, and natural resource management. The study evaluates very high-resolution remotely sensed WorldView-2 (WV-2) imagery for tree species classification in the agroforestry landscape of the Kano Close-Settled Zone (KCSZ), Northern Nigeria. Individual tree crowns extracted by geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) were used to remotely identify nine dominant tree species (Faidherbia albida, Anogeissus leiocarpus, Azadirachta indica, Diospyros mespiliformis, Mangifera indica, Parkia biglobosa, Piliostigma reticulatum, Tamarindus indica, and Vitellaria paradoxa) at the object level. For every tree object in the reference datasets, eight original spectral bands of the WV-2 image, their spectral statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, etc.), spatial, textural, and color-space (hue, saturation), and different spectral vegetation indices (VI) were used as predictor variables for the classification of tree species. Nine different machine learning methods were used for object-level tree species classification. These were Extra Gradient Boost (XGB), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Gradient Boosting (GB), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Multi-layered Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machines (SVM). The two top-performing models in terms of highest accuracies for individual tree species classification were found to be SVM (overall accuracy = 82.1% and Cohen's kappa = 0.79) and MLP (overall accuracy = 81.7% and Cohen's kappa = 0.79) with the lowest numbers of misclassified trees compared to other machine learning methods.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Object based image analysis for remote sensing
    Blaschke, T.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 65 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [2] Blaschke T., 2001, GeoBIT/GIS, V14, P12
  • [3] Boffa J.M., 1999, AGROFORESTRY PARKLAN
  • [4] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [5] The delineation of tree crowns in Australian mixed species forests using hyperspectral Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) data
    Bunting, P
    Lucas, R
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 101 (02) : 230 - 248
  • [6] INVIVO SPECTROSCOPY AND INTERNAL OPTICS OF LEAVES AS BASIS FOR REMOTE-SENSING OF VEGETATION
    BUSCHMANN, C
    NAGEL, E
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1993, 14 (04) : 711 - 722
  • [7] The Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in Urban Tree Species Classification
    Cetin, Zehra
    Yastikli, Naci
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [8] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [9] Mapping tree species composition in South African savannas using an integrated airborne spectral and LiDAR system
    Cho, Moses Azong
    Mathieu, Renaud
    Asner, Gregory P.
    Naidoo, Laven
    van Aardt, Jan
    Ramoelo, Abel
    Debba, Pravesh
    Wessels, Konrad
    Main, Russell
    Smit, Izak P. J.
    Erasmus, Barend
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 125 : 214 - 226
  • [10] Cramer J.S., 2002, Tinbergen Inst. Work. Pap, DOI [DOI 10.2139/SSRN.360300, 10.2139/ssrn.360300]