"You'll come in and dose even in a global pandemic": A qualitative study of adaptive opioid agonist treatment provision during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:10
作者
Conway, Anna [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Treloar, Carla [2 ]
Crawford, Sione [3 ]
Degenhardt, Louisa [4 ]
Dore, Gregory J. [1 ]
Farrell, Michael [4 ]
Hayllar, Jeremy [5 ]
Grebely, Jason [1 ]
Marshall, Alison D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UNSW, Kirby Inst, Sydney, Australia
[2] UNSW, Ctr Social Res Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[3] Harm Reduct Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
[4] UNSW, Natl Drug & Alcohol Res Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[5] Metro North Mental Hlth, Metro North Hosp & Hlth Serv, Alcohol & Drug Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] UNSW, Kirby Inst, Wallace Wurth Bldg, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Risk environment; Drug users; Injecting; PWID; SARS-CoV-2; Treatment; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; METHADONE; PEOPLE; DEPENDENCE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103998
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) improves multiple health and social outcomes, yet requirements to attend for supervised dosing can be burdensome and stigmatising. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions threatened continuity of care and the wellbeing of people receiving OAT, risking a parallel health crisis. This study sought to understand how adaptations in the complex system of OAT provision impacted and responded to risk environments of people receiving OAT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The analysis draws on semi-structured interviews with 40 people receiving and 29 people providing OAT located across Australia. The study considered the risk environments that produce COVID-19 transmission, treatment (non-)adherence, and adverse events for people receiving OAT. Drawing on theories of risk environments and complex adaptive systems, data were coded and analysed to understand how adaptations to the typically rigid system of OAT provision impacted and responded to risk environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: During COVID-19, the complex system of OAT provision demonstrated possibilities for responsive adaptation to the entangled features of risk environments of people receiving OAT. Structural stigma was evident in the services which stayed rigid during the pandemic, requiring people to attend for daily supervised dosing and risking fracturing therapeutic relationships. In parallel, there were several examples of services developing enabling environments by offering flexible care through increased takeaways, treatment subsidies, and home delivery. Conclusions: Rigidity in the delivery of OAT has been an impediment to achieving health and wellbeing over past decades. To sustain health-promoting environments for people receiving OAT, the wider impacts of the complex system should be acknowledged beyond narrowly defined outcomes relating solely to the medication. Centring people receiving OAT in their own care plans will ensure adaptations in the complex system of OAT provision are responsive to the individual's risk environment.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Increased distance was associated with lower daily attendance to an opioid treatment program in Spokane County Washington [J].
Amiri, Solmaz ;
Lutz, Robert ;
Socias, M. Eugenia ;
McDonell, Michael G. ;
Roll, John M. ;
Amram, Ofer .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2018, 93 :26-30
[2]   Economic analysis of out-of-pocket costs among people in opioid agonist treatment: A cross-sectional survey in three Australian jurisdictions [J].
Anh Dam Tran ;
Chen, Rory ;
Nielsen, Suzanne ;
Zahra, Emma ;
Degenhardt, Louisa ;
Santo, Thomas, Jr. ;
Farrell, Michael ;
Larance, Briony .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2022, 99
[3]   Depot buprenorphine during COVID-19 in Australia: Opportunities and challenges [J].
Arunogiri, Shalini ;
Lintzeris, Nicholas .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2021, 124
[4]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2022, NAT OP PHARM STAT AN
[5]   The current status of opioid maintenance treatment in France: a survey of physicians, patients, and out-of-treatment opioid users [J].
Benyamina, Amine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 :449-457
[6]   Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States [J].
Bourgois, P .
CULTURE MEDICINE AND PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 24 (02) :165-195
[7]   Changes in methadone program practices and fatal methadone overdose rates in Connecticut during COVID-19 [J].
Brothers, Sarah ;
Viera, Adam ;
Heimer, Robert .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2021, 131
[8]   Consumer participation in the planning and delivery of drug treatment services: the current arrangements [J].
Bryant, Joanne ;
Saxton, Melissa ;
Madden, Annie ;
Bath, Nicky ;
Robinson, Suzanne .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2008, 27 (02) :130-137
[9]   Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Threshold Opioid-Agonist Treatment in Hard-To-Reach Populations with Opioid Dependence [J].
Chalabianloo, Fatemeh ;
Ohldieck, Christian ;
Haaland, oystein A. ;
Fadnes, Lars Thore ;
Johansson, Kjell Arne .
EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (03) :199-209
[10]   Rigid opiate agonist treatment programmes risk denying people their agency [J].
Chang, Judy .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 380