Evaluation of a patient-centered communication skills training for nurses (KOMPAT): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Lindig, Anja [1 ,2 ]
Mielke, Kendra [1 ,2 ]
Frerichs, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Coellen, Katja [1 ,2 ]
Kriston, Levente [1 ,2 ]
Haerter, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Scholl, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Psychol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Ctr Hlth Care Res & Publ Hlth, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Nursing; Communication; Communication skills training; Patient-centeredness; Implementation research; Randomized controlled trial; Mixed methods; Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design; Train-the-trainer; Self-efficacy; SELF-EFFICACY; CARE; PROGRAM; PROFESSIONALS; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-023-01660-8
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo ensure high quality of nurses' communication as part of patient-centered care, training of communication skills is essential. Previous studies indicate that communication skills trainings can improve communication skills of nurses and have a positive effect on emotional and psychological burden. However, most show methodological limitations, are not specifically developed for nurses or were developed for oncological setting only.MethodsThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a needs-based communication skills training for nursing professionals and to derive indications for future implementation. A two-armed randomized controlled trial including components from both effectiveness and implementation research will be applied. Additionally, a comprehensive process evaluation will be carried out to derive indications for future implementation. Nurses (n=180) of a university medical center in Germany will be randomized to intervention or waitlist-control group. The intervention was developed based on the wishes and needs of nurses, previously assessed via interviews and focus groups. Outcomes to measure effectiveness were selected based on Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation and will be assessed at baseline, post-training and at 4-weeks follow-up. Primary outcome will be nurses' self-reported self-efficacy regarding communication skills. Secondary outcomes include nurses' communication skills assessed via standardized patient assessment, knowledge about patient-centered communication, mental and work-related burden, and participants' satisfaction with training.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first study systematically evaluating the effectiveness of a patient-centered communication skills training for nursing professionals in Germany. Results will yield insight whether a needs-based intervention can improve nurses' self-efficacy regarding communication skills and other secondary outcomes.Trial registrationClinical trial registration number: NCT05700929, trial register: ClinicalTrials.gov (date of registration: 16 November 2022).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a patient-centered communication skills training for nurses (KOMPAT): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Anja Lindig
    Kendra Mielke
    Wiebke Frerichs
    Katja Cöllen
    Levente Kriston
    Martin Härter
    Isabelle Scholl
    BMC Nursing, 23
  • [2] Improving patient-centered communication: Results of a randomized controlled trial
    Maatouk-Buermann, Barbara
    Ringel, Nadja
    Spang, Jochen
    Weiss, Carmen
    Moeltner, Andreas
    Riemann, Urs
    Langewitz, Wolf
    Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
    Juenger, Jana
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [3] The effect of communication skills training on nurses' moral distress: A randomized controlled trial
    Dehghani, Ali
    Sobhanian, Mohammad
    Jahromi, Mohsen Faseleh
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (06):
  • [4] Evaluating a couple communication skills training (CCST) intervention for advanced cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Porter, Laura S.
    Ramos, Katherine
    Baucom, Donald H.
    Steinhauser, Karen
    Erkanli, Alaattin
    Strauman, Timothy J.
    Zafar, S. Yousuf
    Check, Devon K.
    Leo, Karena
    Liu, Evan
    Keefe, Francis J.
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [5] The implementation and evaluation of a communication skills training program for oncology nurses
    Banerjee, Smita C.
    Manna, Ruth
    Coyle, Nessa
    Penn, Stacey
    Gallegos, Tess E.
    Zaider, Talia
    Krueger, Carol A.
    Bialer, Philip A.
    Bylund, Carma L.
    Parker, Patricia A.
    TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 7 (03) : 615 - 623
  • [6] The effect of training in communication skills on medical doctors' and nurses' self-efficacy - A randomized controlled trial
    Ammentorp, Jette
    Sabroe, Svend
    Kofoed, Poul-Erik
    Mainz, Jan
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 66 (03) : 270 - 277
  • [7] Communication Skills Training: A Means to Promote Time-Efficient Patient-Centered Communication in Clinical Practice
    Iversen, Else Dalsgaard
    Wolderslund, Maiken
    Kofoed, Poul-Erik
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    Poulsen, Helle
    Cold, Soren
    Ammentorp, Jette
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-CENTERED RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2021, 8 (04) : 307 - 314
  • [8] Effects of on-site Supportive Communication Training (On-site SCT) on doctor-patient communication in oncology: Study protocol of a randomized, controlled mixed-methods trial
    Antonsen, K. K.
    Johnsen, A. T.
    Poulsen, L. O.
    Lyhne, J. D.
    Lund, L.
    Esser-Naumann, S.
    Timm, S.
    Jensen, L. H.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [9] Patient-centered physical activity coaching in COPD (Walk On!): A study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
    Nguyen, Huong Q.
    Bailey, Adrienne
    Coleman, Karen J.
    Desai, Smita
    Fan, Vincent S.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Maddock, Leah
    Miller, Kimberly
    Towner, William
    Xiang, Anny H.
    Moy, Marilyn L.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 46 : 18 - 29
  • [10] Patient-Centered Communication: Basic Skills
    Hashim, M. Jawad
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2017, 95 (01) : 29 - 34