Psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care in the United Kingdom: A scoping review of primary research

被引:3
作者
Olive, Philippa [1 ]
Hives, Lucy [2 ]
Wilson, Neil [2 ]
Ashton, Amy [3 ]
O'Brien, Marie Claire [4 ]
Mercer, Gemma [5 ]
Jassat, Raeesa [6 ]
Harris, Catherine [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth & Care, Brook Bldg, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Cent Lancashire, Res Facilitat & Delivery Unit, Appl Hlth Res Hub, Preston, Lancs, England
[3] Lancashire Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Clin Hlth Psychol Serv, Preston, Lancs, England
[4] Kings Coll Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Neuropsychol Dept, London, England
[5] Univ Hosp North Midlands NHS Trust, Royal Stoke Univ Hosp, Acute Rehabil Trauma Unit, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[6] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Med, Preston, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Cent Lancashire, Econ Evaluat & Decis Sci SEEDS Grp, Synth, Appl Hlth Res Hub, Preston, Lancs, England
来源
TRAUMA-ENGLAND | 2023年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
Major trauma; polytrauma; injury; psychological; psychosocial; scoping review; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA; INJURY; REHABILITATION; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES; SERVICE; UK; VALIDATION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1177/14604086221104934
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction More people are surviving major trauma, often with life changing injuries. Alongside physical injury, many survivors of major trauma experience psychological and psychosocial impacts. Presently, there is little guidance at the UK national level for psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care. Set in the context of the regional model of major trauma care implemented in the UK in 2012, the purpose of this review was to identify and bring together primary research about psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care in the UK to produce an overview of the field to date, identify knowledge gaps and set research priorities. Methods A scoping review was undertaken. Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, SocINDEX with Full Text and PROSPERO) were searched alongside a targeted grey literature search. Data from included studies were extracted using a predefined extraction form and underwent bibliometric analysis. Included studies were then grouped by type of research, summarised, and synthesised to produce a descriptive summary and overview of the field. Results The searches identified 5,975 articles. Following screening, 43 primary research studies were included in the scoping review. The scoping review, along with previous research, illustrates that psychological and psychosocial impacts are to be expected following major trauma. However, it also found that these aspects of care are commonly underserved and that there are inherent inequities across major trauma care pathways in the UK. Conclusion Though the scoping review identified a growing body of research investigating psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care pathways in the UK, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Research is needed to establish clinically effective psychological and psychosocial assessment tools, corresponding interventions, and patient-centred outcome measures so that survivors of major trauma (and family members or carers) receive the most appropriate care and intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 347
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [51] NHS England, 2013, NHS STAND CONTR MAJ
  • [53] Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906]
  • [54] Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Godfrey, Christina M.
    Khalil, Hanan
    McInerney, Patricia
    Parker, Deborah
    Soares, Cassia Baldini
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [55] Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Marnie, Casey
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Garritty, Chantelle M.
    Hempel, Susanne
    Horsley, Tanya
    Langlois, Etienne V.
    Lillie, Erin
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    Tuncalp, Ozge
    Wilson, Michael G.
    Zarin, Wasifa
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [56] The role of psychological support interventions in trauma patients on mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pham, Christopher H.
    Fang, Mike
    Nager, Jacqueline
    Matsushima, Kazuhide
    Inaba, Kenji
    Kuza, Catherine M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2019, 87 (02) : 463 - 482
  • [57] Price L., NO LESS QUALITY LIFE
  • [58] Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after traumatic brain injury: the FRESH feasibility RCT
    Radford, Kate
    Sutton, Chris
    Sach, Tracey
    Holmes, Jain
    Watkins, Caroline
    Forshaw, Denise
    Jones, Trevor
    Hoffman, Karen
    O'Connor, Rory
    Tyerman, Ruth
    Antonio Merchan-Baeza, Jose
    Morris, Richard
    McManus, Emma
    Drummond, Avril
    Walker, Marion
    Duley, Lelia
    Shakespeare, David
    Hammond, Alison
    Phillips, Julie
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (33) : 1 - +
  • [59] Violent injury predicts poor psychological outcomes after traumatic injury in a hard-to-reach population: an observational cohort study
    Rahtz, Emmylou
    Bhui, Kamaldeep
    Smuk, Melanie
    Hutchison, Iain
    Korszun, Ania
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (05):
  • [60] The helicopter as a caring context: Experiences of people suffering trauma
    Sandstrom, Linda
    Nilsson, Carina
    Juuso, Paivi
    Engstrom, Asa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2017, 32 : 34 - 38