Corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS): a systematic review of literature and future research agenda

被引:2
作者
Jha, Sonika [1 ]
Singh, Anil Kumar [2 ]
Basu, Sriparna [3 ]
机构
[1] FORE Sch Management, Strategy Area, Fellow Programme Management FPM, New Delhi, India
[2] FORE Sch Management, Strategy Area, New Delhi, India
[3] Fore Sch Management, Commun Area, New Delhi, India
关键词
Strategy; Innovation; Start-ups; CEWS; Corporate start-up engagement; OPEN-INNOVATION; CO-CREATION; HIGH-TECH; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; ECOSYSTEM; BUSINESS; ACCELERATORS; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1108/EBR-03-2023-0065
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of literature on corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS) by identifying the modes, contexts, antecedents, barriers and outcomes. As an emerging field, CEWS presently has no such review available which will help in building consensus within the field and shape future research directions.Design/methodology/approach The study followed a two-phased systematic review of literature. Three research databases (i.e. Web of Science, ScienceDirect and SCOPUS) were accessed to gather and conduct the review. Of the total 379 papers retrieved, 63 total relevant papers were studied and analysed. The exhaustive review of literature helped to uncover the contexts, perspectives, antecedents, outcomes and barriers reported across the different modes of CEWS.Findings The study highlighted the five prominent modes of CEWS favoured by large corporations and start-ups. It found that the large corporations and start-ups associate with one another on the basis of complementarities of activities, resources and motives to pursue their strategic orientations. The engagements also face barriers on the ground, such as incompatibility of goals, power imbalances, cultural differences and weak engagement plans. Most important contexts seen were the high-technology industries in the developed economies like the USA and Europe. It also found that ecosystem creation, accessing innovation and corporate strategy have been preferred as the most productive modes of CEWS in the literature.Practical implications This review provides practitioners with a detailed list of the modes and drivers of CEWS. Subsequently, the barriers that need to be managed to successfully execute a specific mode of engagement. This shall enable the practitioners in developing and adopting the best practices while engaging with the start-ups to better facilitate the outcomes of CEWS.Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no systematic literature review available in the domain of CEWS - thus, this study makes an important methodological contribution to the field. By consolidating the fragmented yet growing knowledge on CEWS, the study presents a detailed understanding of what drives and obstructs the engagement between large corporations and start-ups.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 770
页数:46
相关论文
共 155 条
[1]   Limiting factors of open innovation organizations: A case of social product development and research agenda [J].
Abhari, Kaveh ;
McGuckin, Summer .
TECHNOVATION, 2023, 119
[2]   INDUSTRY EVOLUTION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: STEVEN KLEPPER'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, STRATEGY, TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP [J].
Agarwal, Rajshree ;
Braguinsky, Serguey .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (04) :380-397
[3]   The Influence of Multinational Corporations on International Alliance Formation Behavior of Colocated Start-Ups [J].
Aharonson, Barak ;
Bort, Suleika ;
Woywode, Michael .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (03) :770-795
[4]   A global perspective of entrepreneurship and innovation in China [J].
Ahlstrom, David ;
Yang, Xiaohua ;
Wang, Liang ;
Wu, Changqi .
MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 26 (04) :302-318
[5]   Open innovation in SMEs: A process view towards business model innovation [J].
Albats, Ekaterina ;
Podmetina, Daria ;
Vanhaverbeke, Wim .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 61 (06) :2519-2560
[6]   THE TRANSLUCENT HAND OF MANAGED ECOSYSTEMS: ENGAGING COMMUNITIES FOR VALUE CREATION AND CAPTURE [J].
Altman, Elizabeth J. ;
Nagle, Frank ;
Tushman, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2022, 16 (01) :70-101
[7]   Are entrepreneurial venture's innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs [J].
Alvarez-Garrido, Elisa ;
Dushnitsky, Gary .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (05) :819-834
[8]   Value Creation through Novel Resource Configurations in a Digitally Enabled World [J].
Amit, Raphael ;
Han, Xu .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (03) :228-242
[9]   Flagship enterprises, entrepreneurial clusters, and business entry rates: insights from the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship [J].
Anokhin, Sergey ;
Chistyakova, Natalia ;
Antonova, Irina ;
Spitsina, Lyubov ;
Wincent, Joakim ;
Parida, Vinit .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 33 (3-4) :353-367
[10]   Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives [J].
Audretsch, David ;
Colombelli, Alessandra ;
Grilli, Luca ;
Minola, Tommaso ;
Rasmussen, Einar .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (10)