Systematic conservation planning for Antarctic research stations

被引:3
|
作者
Brooks, Shaun T. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Jabour, Julia [2 ]
Hughes, Kevin A. [5 ]
Morgan, Fraser [3 ,4 ]
Convey, Peter [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Polymeropoulos, Elias T. [2 ]
Bergstrom, Dana M. [9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Environm, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Te Punaha Matatini, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] British Antarctic Survey, Nat Environm Res Council, High Cross Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
[6] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Zool, Auckland Pk, South Africa
[7] Cape Horn Int Ctr CHIC, Puerto Williams, Chile
[8] Millennium Inst Biodivers Antarctic & Subantarct E, Santiago, Chile
[9] Univ Wollongong, Global Challenges Program, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
[11] Australian Antarctic Div, Dept Climate Change Energy Environm & Water, Kingston, Australia
[12] CSIRO Environm, 15 Coll Rd, Sandy Bay, Tas 7005, Australia
关键词
Footprint; Values; Pressures; Human impacts; Biodiversity; Management plan; Natural capital; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; WINDMILL ISLANDS; MCMURDO STATION; EAST ANTARCTICA; DAVIS STATION; WASTE-WATER; WILKES-LAND; SEA; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119711
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The small ice-free areas of Antarctica are essential locations for both biodiversity and scientific research but are subject to considerable and expanding human impacts, resulting primarily from station-based research and support activities, and local tourism. Awareness by operators of the need to conserve natural values in and around station and visitor site footprints exists, but the cumulative nature of impacts often results in reactive rather than proactive management. With human activity spread across many isolated pockets of ice-free ground, the pathway to the greatest reduction of human impacts within this natural reserve is through better management of these areas, which are impacted the most. Using a case study of Australia's Casey Station, we found significant natural values persist within the immediate proximity (<10 m) of long-term station infrastructure, but encroachment by physical disturbance results in ongoing pressures. Active planning to better conserve such values would provide a direct opportunity to enhance protection of Antarctica's environment. Here we introduce an approach to systematic conservation planning, tailored to Antarctic research stations, to help managers improve the conservation of values surrounding their activity locations. Use of this approach provides a potential mechanism to balance the need for scientific access to the continent with international obligations to protect its environment. It may also facilitate the development of subordinate conservation tools, including management plans and natural capital accounting. By proactively minimising and containing their station footprints, national programs can also independently demonstrate their commitment to protecting Antarctica's environment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chemometric Tools in Chemical Fractionation Data of Soil Samples from Five Antarctic Research Stations
    Guerra, Marcelo B. B.
    Rosa, Paula F.
    Schaefer, Carlos E. G. R.
    Michel, Roberto F. M.
    Almeida, Ivan C.
    Pereira-Filho, Edenir R.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 23 (07) : 1388 - +
  • [22] Personal care products and steroid hormones in the Antarctic coastal environment associated with two Antarctic research stations, McMurdo Station and Scott Base
    Emnet, Philipp
    Gaw, Sally
    Northcott, Grant
    Storey, Bryan
    Graham, Lisa
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 136 : 331 - 342
  • [23] Determination of priority areas for amphibian conservation in Guerrero (Mexico), through systematic conservation planning tools
    Gonzalez-Fernandez, Andrea
    Gonzalez-Salazar, Constantino
    Sunny, Armando
    Ruiz-Gutierrez, Fernando
    Chavez, Cuauhtemoc
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2022, 68
  • [24] Towards systematic and evidence-based conservation planning for western chimpanzees
    Heinicke, Stefanie
    Mundry, Roger
    Boesch, Christophe
    Hockings, Kimberley J.
    Kormos, Rebecca
    Ndiaye, Papa Ibnou
    Tweh, Clement G.
    Williamson, Elizabeth A.
    Kuehl, Hjalmar S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2019, 81 (09)
  • [25] Systematic Conservation Planning as a Tool for the Assessment of Protected Areas Network in Jordan
    Boulad, Natalia
    Al Shogoor, Sattam
    Sahwan, Wahib
    Al-Ouran, Nedal
    Schuett, Brigitta
    LAND, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [26] Marine systematic conservation planning for Rodrigues Island, western Indian Ocean
    Pasnin, Olivier
    Attwood, Colin
    Klaus, Rebecca
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 130 : 213 - 220
  • [27] An approach for ensuring minimum protected area size in systematic conservation planning
    Smith, Robert J.
    Di Minin, Enrico
    Linke, Simon
    Segan, Daniel B.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (11) : 2525 - 2531
  • [28] Carnivore conservation planning on Borneo: identifying key carnivore landscapes, research priorities and conservation interventions
    Mathai, John
    Duckworth, J. W.
    Meijaard, Erik
    Fredriksson, Gabriella
    Hon, Jason
    Sebastian, Anthony
    Ancrenaz, Marc
    Hearn, Andrew J.
    Ross, Joanna
    Cheyne, Susan
    Wilting, Andreas
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, : 186 - 217
  • [29] Progress and challenges in freshwater conservation planning
    Nel, Jeanne L.
    Roux, Dirk J.
    Abell, Robin
    Ashton, Peter J.
    Cowling, Richard M.
    Higgins, Jonathan V.
    Thieme, Michele
    Viers, Joshua H.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2009, 19 (04) : 474 - 485
  • [30] Global research priorities for historical ecology to inform conservation
    Mcclenachan, Loren
    Rick, Torben
    Thurstan, Ruth H.
    Trant, Andrew
    Alagona, Peter S.
    Alleway, Heidi K.
    Armstrong, Chelsey
    Bliege Bird, Rebecca
    Rubio-Cisneros, Nadia T.
    Clavero, Miguel
    Colonese, Andre C.
    Cramer, Katie
    Davis, Ancilleno O.
    Drew, Joshua
    Early-Capistran, Michelle M.
    Gil-Romera, Graciela
    Grace, Molly
    Hatch, Marco B. A.
    Higgs, Eric
    Hoffman, Kira
    Jackson, Jeremy B. C.
    Jerardino, Antonieta
    Lefebvre, Michelle J.
    Lotze, Heike K.
    Mohammed, Ryan S.
    Morueta-Holme, Naia
    Munteanu, Catalina
    Mychajliw, Alexis M.
    Newsom, Bonnie
    O'Dea, Aaron
    Pauly, Daniel
    Szabo, Peter
    Torres, Jimena
    Waldman, John
    West, Catherine
    Xu, Liqiang
    Yasuoka, Hirokazu
    zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E.
    Van Houtan, Kyle S.
    ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH, 2024, 54 : 285 - 310