Systematic conservation planning for Antarctic research stations

被引:3
|
作者
Brooks, Shaun T. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Jabour, Julia [2 ]
Hughes, Kevin A. [5 ]
Morgan, Fraser [3 ,4 ]
Convey, Peter [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Polymeropoulos, Elias T. [2 ]
Bergstrom, Dana M. [9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Environm, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Te Punaha Matatini, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] British Antarctic Survey, Nat Environm Res Council, High Cross Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
[6] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Zool, Auckland Pk, South Africa
[7] Cape Horn Int Ctr CHIC, Puerto Williams, Chile
[8] Millennium Inst Biodivers Antarctic & Subantarct E, Santiago, Chile
[9] Univ Wollongong, Global Challenges Program, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
[11] Australian Antarctic Div, Dept Climate Change Energy Environm & Water, Kingston, Australia
[12] CSIRO Environm, 15 Coll Rd, Sandy Bay, Tas 7005, Australia
关键词
Footprint; Values; Pressures; Human impacts; Biodiversity; Management plan; Natural capital; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; WINDMILL ISLANDS; MCMURDO STATION; EAST ANTARCTICA; DAVIS STATION; WASTE-WATER; WILKES-LAND; SEA; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119711
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The small ice-free areas of Antarctica are essential locations for both biodiversity and scientific research but are subject to considerable and expanding human impacts, resulting primarily from station-based research and support activities, and local tourism. Awareness by operators of the need to conserve natural values in and around station and visitor site footprints exists, but the cumulative nature of impacts often results in reactive rather than proactive management. With human activity spread across many isolated pockets of ice-free ground, the pathway to the greatest reduction of human impacts within this natural reserve is through better management of these areas, which are impacted the most. Using a case study of Australia's Casey Station, we found significant natural values persist within the immediate proximity (<10 m) of long-term station infrastructure, but encroachment by physical disturbance results in ongoing pressures. Active planning to better conserve such values would provide a direct opportunity to enhance protection of Antarctica's environment. Here we introduce an approach to systematic conservation planning, tailored to Antarctic research stations, to help managers improve the conservation of values surrounding their activity locations. Use of this approach provides a potential mechanism to balance the need for scientific access to the continent with international obligations to protect its environment. It may also facilitate the development of subordinate conservation tools, including management plans and natural capital accounting. By proactively minimising and containing their station footprints, national programs can also independently demonstrate their commitment to protecting Antarctica's environment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survey of waste water disposal practices at Antarctic research stations
    Grondahl, Fredrik
    Sidenmark, Johan
    Thomsen, Ann
    POLAR RESEARCH, 2009, 28 (02) : 298 - 306
  • [2] The Impact of Systematic Conservation Planning
    McIntosh, Emma J.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Lloyd, Samuel
    Smith, Robert J.
    Grenyer, Richard
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 42, 2017, 42 : 677 - 697
  • [3] Reconciling diverse viewpoints within systematic conservation planning
    Cunningham, Charles A. A.
    Crick, Humphrey Q. P.
    Morecroft, Mike D. D.
    Thomas, Chris D. D.
    Beale, Colin M. M.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2023, 5 (02) : 621 - 632
  • [4] Reorienting Systematic Conservation Assessment for Effective Conservation Planning
    Sewall, Brent J.
    Freestone, Amy L.
    Moutui, Mohamed F. E.
    Toilibou, Nassuri
    Said, Ishaka
    Toumani, Saindou M.
    Attoumane, Daoud
    Iboura, Cheikh M.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (04) : 688 - 696
  • [5] Molecular ecology meets systematic conservation planning
    Nielsen, Erica S.
    Hanson, Jeffrey O.
    Carvalho, Silvia B.
    Beger, Maria
    Henriques, Romina
    Kershaw, Francine
    von der Heyden, Sophie
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 38 (02) : 143 - 155
  • [6] Advancing Systematic Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services
    Villarreal-Rosas, Jaramar
    Sonter, Laura J.
    Runting, Rebecca K.
    Lopez-Cubillos, Sofia
    Dade, Marie C.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2020, 35 (12) : 1129 - 1139
  • [7] Hydrochemical characteristics of snow and lake waters of Antarctic oases in the areas of research stations
    Kakarekaa, S. V.
    Kukharchyk, T. I.
    Tarasenko, S. Yu.
    Rabychyn, K. O.
    Kokosh, Yu. G.
    Kurman, P. V.
    LED I SNEG-ICE AND SNOW, 2024, 64 (03): : 431 - 446
  • [8] Conservation features of the terrestrial Antarctic Peninsula
    Lee, Jasmine R.
    Shaw, Justine D.
    Ropert-Coudert, Yan
    Terauds, Aleks
    Chown, Steven L.
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (07) : 1037 - 1049
  • [9] Contamination of the marine environment by Antarctic research stations: Monitoring marine pollution at Casey station from 1997 to 2015
    Stark, Jonathan S.
    Johnstone, Glenn J.
    King, Catherine
    Raymond, Tania
    Rutter, Allison
    Stark, Scott C.
    Townsend, Ashley T.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [10] Could European marine conservation policy benefit from systematic conservation planning?
    Giakoumi, Sylvaine
    Katsanevakis, Stelios
    Vassilopoulou, Vassiliki
    Panayotidis, Panayotis
    Kavadas, Stefanos
    Issaris, Yiannis
    Kokkali, Athina
    Frantzis, Alexandros
    Panou, Aliki
    Mavrommati, Georgia
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 22 (06) : 762 - 775