Comparative Analysis of Optical Quality of Monofocal, Enhanced Monofocal, Multifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Mobile Model Eye Study

被引:3
作者
Kim, Eun Chul [1 ]
Cho, Soo Yeon [1 ]
Kang, Ji Eon [1 ]
Nam, Gahee [1 ]
Yoon, Young Chae [1 ]
Whang, Woong-Joo [1 ]
Na, Kyung-Sun [1 ]
Kim, Hyun-Seung [1 ]
Hwang, Ho Sik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Yeouido St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 10 63 Ro, Seoul 07345, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
multifocal; intraocular lens; model eye; halo; defocus curve; OF-VISION IOLS; VISUAL OUTCOMES; BILATERAL IMPLANTATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; INTERMEDIATE FUNCTION; NEW-GENERATION; RANGE; PERFORMANCE; WORLD;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.12.7.5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To use the revised model eye to observe and compare how the world is perceived by patients with monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), Eyhance, bifocal IOL, and Symfony, and check its performance. Methods: The new mobile model eye consists of an artificial cornea, an IOL, a wet cell, an adjustable lens tube, a lens tube, an objective lens, a tube lens, and a digital single-lens reflex camera. We collected photographs of distant buildings and streets at night, videos of the focusing process, and videos of United States Air Force resolution target from 6 m to 15 cm and analyzed them quantitatively.Results: In this revised model eye using an objective lens, an artificial cornea similar to the human cornea could be used. Using a digital single-lens reflex camera, high resolution imaging was possible without an additional computer. Fine focusing was possible using an adjustable lens tube. For monofocal IOL, the contrast modulation was 0.39 at 6 m and decreased consistently. It was nearly 0 as the model eye got closer than 1.6 m. For Eyhance, the contrast modulation was 0.40 at 6 m. It then decreased and increased again. At 1.3 m, it was 0.07 and then decreased again. For Symfony, the contrast modulation was 0.18 at 6 m. Symfony showed the characteristics of a bifocal IOL with low add diopter. Halos (234 pixels) were observed around lights, although smaller than those seen with bifocal IOL (432 pixels).Conclusions: We could objectively observe and compare how patients with monofocal IOL, Eyhance, bifocal IOL, and Symfony perceived the world using this revised model eye. Translational Relevance: Data obtained by this new mobile model eye can be used to help patients select their IOLs before cataract surgeries.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial [J].
Reinhard, Thomas ;
Maier, Philip ;
Boehringer, Daniel ;
Bertelmann, Eckart ;
Brockmann, Tobias ;
Kiraly, Laszlo ;
Salom, David ;
Piovella, Matteo ;
Colonval, Stephane ;
Mendicute, Javier .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 259 (02) :431-442
[32]   Evaluating Optical Quality of a New Hydrophilic Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens and Comparison to the Monofocal Counterpart: An Optical Bench Analysis [J].
Borkenstein, Andreas F. ;
Borkenstein, Eva-Maria ;
Schmid, Ruediger .
OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2022, 11 (06) :2045-2056
[33]   Comparative analysis of a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens that combines extended depth-of-focus and bifocal profiles with a standard monofocal intraocular lens [J].
Shin, Da Eun ;
Lee, Hun ;
Koh, Kyungmin .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[34]   Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study [J].
Sabur, Huri ;
Unsal, Ugur .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) :262-268
[35]   A comparison of clinical outcomes and optical performance between monofocal and new monofocal with enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses: a case-control study [J].
Huh, Jungah ;
Eom, Youngsub ;
Yang, Seul Ki ;
Choi, Young ;
Kim, Hyo Myung ;
Song, Jong Suk .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
[36]   Visual and optical quality of enhanced intermediate monofocal versus standard monofocal intraocular lens [J].
Garzon, Nuria ;
Poyales, Francisco ;
Albarran-Diego, Cesar ;
Rico-del-Viejo, Laura ;
Perez-Sanz, Lidia ;
Garcia-Montero, Maria .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 260 (11) :3617-3625
[37]   Comparison Between an Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00) and a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens With Enhanced Intermediate Vision (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00) [J].
Jeon, Young Joon ;
Yoon, Yisang ;
Kim, Tae-im ;
Koh, Kyungmin .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 10 (06) :542-547
[38]   Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery [J].
Hu, Jenny Q. ;
Sarkar, Reith ;
Sella, Ruti ;
Murphy, James D. ;
Afshari, Natalie A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 208 :305-312
[39]   Evaluation of Optical Quality: Ocular Scattering and Aberrations in Eyes Implanted with Diffractive Multifocal or Monofocal Intraocular Lenses [J].
Liao, Xuan ;
Lin, Jia ;
Tian, Jing ;
Wen, BaiWei ;
Tan, QingQing ;
Lan, ChangJun .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (06) :696-701
[40]   Comparison of near vision, intraocular lens movement, and depth of focus with accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses [J].
Dhital, Anish ;
Spalton, David J. ;
Gala, Kavita B. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (12) :1872-1878