The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical application value of 3.0T MR diffusion tensor imaging in grade diagnosis of gliomas
    Shan, Wei
    Wang, Xing-Long
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (02) : 2009 - 2014
  • [42] MR neurography of the median nerve at 3.0T: Optimization of diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Eppenberger, Patrick
    Markovic, Daniel
    Nanz, Daniel
    Chhabra, Avneesh
    Pruessmann, Klaas P.
    Andreisek, Gustav
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (07) : E775 - E782
  • [43] A preliminary study of 3.0-T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Fulong Dong
    Yuanyuan Wu
    Peiwen Song
    Yinfeng Qian
    Ying Wang
    Liyan Xu
    Minmin Yin
    Renjie Zhang
    Hui Tao
    Peng Ge
    Chang Liu
    Huaqing Zhang
    Jinwen Zhu
    Cailiang Shen
    Yongqiang Yu
    European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 1839 - 1845
  • [44] A preliminary study of 3.0-T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Dong, Fulong
    Wu, Yuanyuan
    Song, Peiwen
    Qian, Yinfeng
    Wang, Ying
    Xu, Liyan
    Yin, Minmin
    Zhang, Renjie
    Tao, Hui
    Ge, Peng
    Liu, Chang
    Zhang, Huaqing
    Zhu, Jinwen
    Shen, Cailiang
    Yu, Yongqiang
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (08) : 1839 - 1845
  • [45] Diffusion tensor imaging characterization of occult brain damage in relapsing neuromyelitis optica using 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging techniques
    Zhao, Dai-Di
    Zhou, Hong-Yu
    Wu, Qi-Zhu
    Liu, Ju
    Chen, Xiu-Ying
    He, Dian
    He, Xiao-Fei
    Han, Wen-Jie
    Gong, Qi-Yong
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (04) : 3173 - 3177
  • [46] 3T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in chronic kidney disease
    Wen-juan Wang
    Margaret H. Pui
    Yan Guo
    Li-qin Wang
    Huan-jun Wang
    Mingjuan Liu
    Abdominal Imaging, 2014, 39 : 770 - 775
  • [47] Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T
    Capuani, Silvia
    Maiuro, Alessandra
    Giampa, Emiliano
    Montuori, Marco
    Varrucciu, Viviana
    Hagberg, Gisela E.
    Vinicola, Vincenzo
    Colonna, Sergio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [48] Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: A prospective comparison study of image quality
    Ullrich, T.
    Quentin, M.
    Oelers, C.
    Dietzel, F.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Arsov, C.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Blondin, D.
    Wittsack, H. J.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 : 192 - 197
  • [49] Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) of the Kidney at 3 Tesla-Feasibility, Protocol Evaluation and Comparison to 1.5 Tesla
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Dietrich, Olaf
    Horger, Wihelm
    Horng, Annie
    Helck, Andreas D.
    Herrmann, Karin A.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Glaser, Christian
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (05) : 245 - 254
  • [50] Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T
    Server, Andres
    Graff, Bjorn A.
    Josefsen, Roger
    Orheim, Tone E. D.
    Schellhorn, Till
    Nordhoy, Wibeke
    Nakstad, Per H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (03) : E156 - E165