The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Track density imaging using diffusion tensor imaging data from 1.5 T MRI scanner
    Kosker, Fatma Betul
    Gumus, Kazim Ziya
    Tokmakci, Mahmut
    Acer, Niyazi
    Senol, Serkan
    Bilgen, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2022, 30 (06) : 2044 - 2053
  • [32] Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of Skeletal Muscle: Optimization of b Value for Imaging at 1.5 T
    Saupe, Nadja
    White, Lawrence M.
    Stainsby, Jeffrey
    Tomlinson, George
    Sussman, Marshall S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (06) : W282 - W290
  • [33] Optimization of the Parameters for Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Acquisition for Breast Fiber Tractography at 1.5 T
    Wang, Yuan
    Zhang, Xiao-Peng
    Li, Yan-Ling
    Li, Xiao-Ting
    Hu, Yan
    Cui, Yong
    Sun, Ying-Shi
    Zhang, Xiao-Yan
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [34] Quality assurance for diffusion tensor imaging using an ACR phantom: Comparative analysis with 6, 15, and 32 directions at 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems
    Lee, Jung-Hoon
    Kim, Sang-Young
    Lee, Do-Wan
    Jung, Jin-Young
    Song, Kyu-Ho
    Choe, Bo-Young
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [35] Effects of Echo Time on Diffusion Quantification of Brain White Matter at 1.5T and 3.0T
    Qin, Wen
    Yu, Chun Shui
    Zhang, Fan
    Du, Xiang Ying
    Jiang, Heng
    Yan, Yu Xia
    Li, Kun Cheng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 61 (04) : 755 - 760
  • [36] Quality assurance for diffusion tensor imaging using an ACR phantom: Comparative analysis with 6, 15, and 32 directions at 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems
    Jung-Hoon Lee
    Sang-Young Kim
    Do-Wan Lee
    Jin-Young Jung
    Kyu-Ho Song
    Bo-Young Choe
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2014, 65 : 103 - 110
  • [37] Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain in a healthy adult population: Normative values and measurement reproducibility at 3 T and 1.5 T
    Brander, Antti
    Kataja, Anneli
    Saastamoinen, Antti
    Ryymin, Pertti
    Huhtala, Heini
    Ohman, Juha
    Soimakallio, Seppo
    Dastidar, Prasun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (07) : 800 - 807
  • [38] A comparison of cine CMR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T
    W. Patricia Bandettini
    Sujata M. Shanbhag
    Christine Mancini
    Delaney R. McGuirt
    Peter Kellman
    Hui Xue
    Jennifer L. Henry
    Margaret Lowery
    Swee Lay Thein
    Marcus Y. Chen
    Adrienne E. Campbell-Washburn
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 22
  • [39] Multi-parametric MRI characterization of healthy human thigh muscles at 3.0 T - relaxation, magnetization transfer, fat/water, and diffusion tensor imaging
    Li, Ke
    Dortch, Richard D.
    Welch, E. Brian
    Bryant, Nathan D.
    Buck, Amanda K. W.
    Towse, Theodore F.
    Gochberg, Daniel F.
    Does, Mark D.
    Damon, Bruce M.
    Park, Jane H.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 27 (09) : 1070 - 1084
  • [40] Quantitative assessment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with diffusion tensor imaging in 3.0T magnetic resonance
    Tang, Meili
    Chen, Xin
    Zhou, Quan
    Liu, Bo
    Liu, Yupin
    Liu, Sirun
    Chen, Zhiyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (05): : 8295 - 8303