The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative Diffusion Imaging of Adipose Tissue in the Human Lower Leg at 1.5 T
    Steidle, G.
    Eibofner, F.
    Schick, F.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 65 (04) : 1119 - 1125
  • [22] A comparison of simultaneous multislice and conventional diffusion tensor imaging techniques for ischemic stroke evaluation at 1.5T
    Culleton, Sinead
    Kolowori, Seyyed Kazem Hashemizadeh
    Roberts, John
    De Havenon, Adam
    Dibella, Edward
    Mcnally, J. Scott
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 96 (1141)
  • [23] Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T
    Tagliafico, A.
    Rescinito, G.
    Monetti, F.
    Villa, A.
    Chiesa, F.
    Fisci, E.
    Pace, D.
    Calabrese, M.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (06): : 992 - 1003
  • [24] 3T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in chronic kidney disease
    Wang, Wen-juan
    Pui, Margaret H.
    Guo, Yan
    Wang, Li-qin
    Wang, Huan-jun
    Liu, Mingjuan
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2014, 39 (04): : 770 - 775
  • [25] Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of the median nerve at 1.5T: optimization of b value
    Gustav Andreisek
    Lawrence M. White
    Andrea Kassner
    George Tomlinson
    Marshall S. Sussman
    Skeletal Radiology, 2009, 38 : 51 - 59
  • [26] Feasibility of Diffusion Tensor Tractography of Brachial Plexus Injuries at 1.5 T
    Gasparotti, Roberto
    Lodoli, Giovanni
    Meoded, Avner
    Carletti, Francesco
    Garozzo, Debora
    Ferraresi, Stefano
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (02) : 104 - 112
  • [27] Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla
    Li, Chunmei
    Chen, Min
    Li, Saying
    Zhao, Xuna
    Zhang, Chen
    Liu, Ming
    Zhou, Cheng
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2011, 52 (07) : 813 - 817
  • [28] MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences
    Kornaat, PR
    Reeder, SB
    Koo, S
    Brittain, JH
    Yu, H
    Andriacchi, TP
    Gold, GE
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2005, 13 (04) : 338 - 344
  • [29] Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Normal Foot at 3 T
    Elzibak, Alyaa H.
    Kumbhare, Dinesh A.
    Harish, Srinivasan
    Noseworthy, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (03) : 329 - 334
  • [30] Diffusion tensor imaging and histology of developing hearts
    Abdullah, Osama M.
    Seidel, Thomas
    Dahl, MarJanna
    Gomez, Arnold David
    Yiep, Gavin
    Cortino, Julia
    Sachse, Frank B.
    Albertine, Kurt H.
    Hsu, Edward W.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 29 (10) : 1338 - 1349