The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Xiaodan Li
    Rui Chen
    Xi Xu
    Zebin Xiao
    Xiaoyu Wei
    Yuelong Yang
    Zhongping Zhang
    Zhigang Wu
    Yanjie Zhu
    Hui Liu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [2] Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Human Forearm Muscles at 3.0 T in a Clinical Setting
    Froeling, Martijn
    Oudeman, Jos
    van den Berg, Sandra
    Nicolay, Klaas
    Maas, Mario
    Strijkers, Gustav J.
    Drost, Maarten R.
    Nederveen, Aart J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 64 (04) : 1182 - 1190
  • [3] IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Cui, Yong
    Dyvorne, Hadrien
    Besa, Cecilia
    Cooper, Nancy
    Taouli, Bachir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2015, 2 : 123 - 128
  • [4] Direct quantitative comparison between cross-relaxation imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of the human brain at 3.0 T
    Underhil, Hunter R.
    Yuan, Chun
    Yarnykh, Vasily L.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 47 (04) : 1568 - 1578
  • [5] Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis
    Fushimi, Yasutaka
    Miki, Yukio
    Okada, Tsutomu
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Mori, Nobuyuki
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Urayama, Shin-ichi
    Aso, Toshihiko
    Fukuyama, Hidenao
    Kikuta, Ken-ichiro
    Togashi, Kaori
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (08) : 743 - 748
  • [6] Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Healthy Skeletal Muscles A Comparison Between 7 T and 3 T
    Giraudo, Chiara
    Motyka, Stanislav
    Weber, Michael
    Feiweier, Thorsten
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2019, 54 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [7] 3.0 T diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of the testes in nonobstructive azoospermia
    Pappa, Ourania
    Astrakas, Loukas
    Anagnostou, Nikoletta
    Bougia, Christina K.
    Maliakas, Vasileios
    Sofikitis, Nikolaos
    Argyropoulou, Maria I.
    Tsili, Athina C.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (12) : 4543 - 4555
  • [8] Test-retest reliability of diffusion tensor imaging of the liver at 3.0 T
    Girometti, Rossano
    Maieron, Marta
    Lissandrello, Giovanni
    Bazzocchi, Massimo
    Zuiani, Chiara
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (06): : 489 - 497
  • [9] Depiction of periprostatic nerve fibers by means of 1.5 T diffusion tensor imaging
    Di Paola, Valerio
    Totaro, Angelo
    Gui, Benedetta
    Micco, Maura
    Rodolfino, Elena
    Avesani, Giacomo
    Panico, Camilla
    Gigli, Riccardo
    Cybulski, Adam
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Bassi, PierFrancesco
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (06) : 2760 - 2769
  • [10] MR Imaging of Endometrial Carcinoma for Preoperative Staging at 3.0 T: Comparison With Imaging at 1.5 T
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imaoka, Izumi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Nakaya, Yasuhiro
    Tomoda, Kaname
    Tsutsui, Tateki
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Kimura, Tadashi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (03) : 621 - 630