Implementation of ultrasound after central venous catheter insertion: A qualitative study in early adopters

被引:3
作者
Ablordeppey, Enyo A. [1 ,2 ]
Keating, Shannon M. [1 ]
Brown, Katherine M. [3 ]
Theodoro, Daniel L. [2 ]
Griffey, Richard T. [2 ]
James, Aimee S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Sch Med St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Sch Med St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Central lines; qualitative methods; ultrasonography; focus groups; CFIR; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/11297298211053447
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption rate of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for the confirmation of central venous catheter (CVC) positioning and exclusion of post procedure pneumothorax is low despite advantages in workflow compared to traditional chest X-ray (CXR). To explore why, we convened focus groups to address barriers and facilitators of implementation for POCUS guided CVC confirmation and de-implementation of post-procedure CXR. Methods: We conducted focus groups with emergency medicine and critical care providers to discuss current practices in POCUS for CVC confirmation. The semi-structured focus group interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We performed qualitative content analysis of the resulting transcripts using a consensual qualitative research approach (NVivo software), aiming to identify priority categories that describe the barriers and facilitators of POCUS guided CVC confirmation. Results: The coding dictionary of barriers and facilitators consisted of 21 codes from the focus group discussions. Our qualitative analysis revealed that 12 codes emerged spontaneously (inductively) within the focus group discussions and aligned directly to CFIR constructs. Common barriers included provider influences (e.g. knowledge and beliefs about POCUS for CVC confirmation), external network (e.g. societal guidelines, ancillary staff, and consultants), and inertia (habit or reflexive processes). Common facilitators included ultrasound protocol advantage and champions. Time and provider outcomes (cognitive offload, ownership, and independence) emerged as early barriers but late facilitators. Conclusion: Our qualitative analysis demonstrates real and perceived barriers against implementation of POCUS for CVC position confirmation and pneumothorax exclusion. Our findings discovered organizational and personal constructs that will inform development of multifaceted strategies toward implementation of POCUS after CVC insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 888
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of ultrasound during and after central venous catheter insertion versus conventional chest X-ray after insertion of a central venous catheter
    Blans, M. J.
    Endeman, H.
    Bosch, F. H.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 74 (08) : 353 - 357
  • [2] CURRENT PRACTICES IN CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER POSITION CONFIRMATION BY POINT OF CARE ULTRASOUND: A SURVEY OF EARLY ADOPTERS
    Ablordeppey, Enyo A.
    Drewry, Anne M.
    Theodoro, Daniel L.
    Tian, LinLin
    Fuller, Brian M.
    Griffey, Richard T.
    SHOCK, 2019, 51 (05): : 613 - 618
  • [3] The bubble study: ultrasound confirmation of central venous catheter placement
    Duran-Gehring, Petra E.
    Guirgis, Faheem W.
    McKee, Kristin C.
    Goggans, Susan
    Huynh Tran
    Kalynych, Colleen J.
    Wears, Robert L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [4] Nonfatal cardiac perforation after central venous catheter insertion
    Premuzic, Vedran
    Katalinic, Lea
    Pasalic, Marijan
    Jurin, Hrvoje
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (01) : 118 - 120
  • [5] Central Venous Catheter Insertion and Bedside Ultrasound: Building a New Standard of Care?
    Remerand, Francis
    Espitalier, Fabien
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (10) : 1793 - 1794
  • [6] Inadvertent arterial insertion of a central venous catheter
    Chan, Victor W. T.
    Shek, K. W.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (04)
  • [7] A rare complication of central venous catheter insertion
    Belohlavek, T.
    Zol'ak, V
    Koeppl, J.
    Nosal, S.
    ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNI MEDICINA, 2021, 32 (01): : 44 - 47
  • [8] Unsuspected path: a central venous catheter insertion
    Agostinho, Nelson
    Robinson, Benjamin M.
    Yan, Tristan D.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (09) : E100 - E101
  • [9] Ultrasonic examination - An alternative to chest radiography after central venous catheter insertion?
    Maury, E
    Guglielminotti, J
    Alzieu, M
    Guidet, B
    Offenstadt, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 164 (03) : 403 - 405
  • [10] Novel Educational Module for Subclavian Central Venous Catheter Insertion Using Real-Time Ultrasound Guidance
    Bayci, Andrew W. L.
    Mangla, Jimmi
    Jenkins, Christina S.
    Ivascu, Felicia A.
    Robbins, James M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (06) : 1217 - 1223