Stellar mass is not the best predictor of galaxy metallicity The gravitational potential-metallicity relation ΦZR

被引:4
|
作者
Sanchez-Menguiano, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Almeida, Jorge Sanchez [3 ,4 ]
Sanchez, Sebastian F. [5 ]
Munoz-Tunon, Casiana [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Ciencias, Dept Fis Teor & Cosmos, Edificio Mecenas, Granada 18071, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Inst Carlos I Fis Teor & Computac, Granada 18071, Spain
[3] Inst Astrofis Canarias, Tenerife 38205, Spain
[4] Univ La Laguna, Dept Astrofis, Tenerife 38206, Spain
[5] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Astron, AP 106, Ensenada 22800, BC, Mexico
关键词
techniques: imaging spectroscopy; galaxies: abundances; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: evolution; STAR-FORMATION RATE; SDSS-IV MANGA; GAS-PHASE METALLICITY; CHEMICAL EVOLUTION; FORMING GALAXIES; DARK-MATTER; COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS; FUNDAMENTAL RELATION; NITROGEN ABUNDANCES; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202346708
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Interpreting the scaling relations followed by galaxies is a fundamental tool for assessing how well we understand galaxy formation and evolution. Several scaling relations involving the galaxy metallicity have been discovered through the years, the foremost of which is the scaling with stellar mass. This so-called mass-metallicity relation is thought to be fundamental and has been subject to many studies in the literature.Aims. We study the dependence of the gas-phase metallicity on many different galaxy properties to assess which of them determines the metallicity of a galaxy.Methods. We applied a random forest regressor algorithm on a sample of more than 3000 nearby galaxies from the SDSS-IV MaNGA survey. Using this machine-learning technique, we explored the effect of 148 parameters on the global oxygen abundance as an indicator of the gas metallicity.Results. M-star/R-e, as a proxy for the baryonic gravitational potential of the galaxy, is found to be the primary factor determining the average gas-phase metallicity of the galaxy (Z(g)). It outweighs stellar mass. A subsequent analysis provides the strongest dependence of Z(g) on M-star/R-e(0.6). We argue that this parameter traces the total gravitational potential, and the exponent alpha similar or equal to 0.6 accounts for the inclusion of the dark matter component.Conclusions. Our results reveal the importance of the relation between the total gravitational potential of the galaxy and the gas metallicity. This relation is tighter and likely more primordial than the widely known mass-metallicity relation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] More fundamental than the fundamental metallicity relation The effect of the stellar metallicity on the gas-phase mass-metallicity and gravitational potential-metallicity relations
    Sanchez-Menguiano, Laura
    Sanchez, Sebastian F.
    Sanchez Almeida, Jorge
    Munoz-Tunon, Casiana
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2024, 682
  • [2] The origin and evolution of the galaxy mass-metallicity relation
    Ma, Xiangcheng
    Hopkins, Philip F.
    Faucher-Giguere, Claude-Andre
    Zolman, Nick
    Muratov, Alexander L.
    Keres, Dusan
    Quataert, Eliot
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 456 (02) : 2140 - 2156
  • [3] The dependence of the galaxy mass-metallicity relation on environment and the implied metallicity of the IGM
    Peng, Ying-jie
    Maiolino, Roberto
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 438 (01) : 262 - 270
  • [4] Explaining the scatter in the galaxy mass-metallicity relation with gas flows
    van Loon, Maria L.
    Mitchell, Peter D.
    Schaye, Joop
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 504 (04) : 4817 - 4828
  • [5] Mass-metallicity and star formation rate in galaxies: A complex relation tuned to stellar age
    Puertas, S. Duarte
    Vilchez, J. M.
    Iglesias-Paramo, J.
    Molla, M.
    Perez-Montero, E.
    Kehrig, C.
    Pilyugin, L. S.
    Zinchenko, I. A.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2022, 666
  • [6] The stellar fundamental metallicity relation: the correlation between stellar mass, star formation rate, and stellar metallicity
    Looser, Tobias J.
    D'Eugenio, Francesco
    Piotrowska, Joanna M.
    Belfiore, Francesco
    Maiolino, Roberto
    Cappellari, Michele
    Baker, William M.
    Tacchella, Sandro
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 532 (02) : 2832 - 2841
  • [7] Does the fundamental metallicity relation evolve with redshift? - II. The evolution in normalization of the mass-metallicity relation
    Garcia, Alex M.
    Torrey, Paul
    Ellison, Sara L.
    Grasha, Kathryn
    Chen, Qian-Hui
    Hemler, Z. S.
    Zimmerman, Dhruv T.
    Wright, Ruby J.
    Zovaro, Henry R. M.
    Nelson, Erica J.
    Sanders, Ryan L.
    Kewley, Lisa J.
    Hernquist, Lars
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 536 (01) : 119 - 144
  • [8] On the galaxy stellar mass function, the mass-metallicity relation and the implied baryonic mass function
    Baldry, I. K.
    Glazebrook, K.
    Driver, S. P.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 388 (03) : 945 - 959
  • [9] The galaxy cluster AC114-II. Stellar populations and the mass-metallicity relation
    Saviane, Ivo
    Yegorova, Irina
    Proust, Dominique
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 526 (02) : 2458 - 2478
  • [10] Is the Stellar Mass-Stellar Metallicity Relation Universal in the Milky Way Satellites and Beyond?
    Xia, Moran
    Yu, Qingjuan
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 874 (01)