Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of mathematical models in distinguishing ultrasound imaging of breast nodules

被引:2
作者
Li, Lu [1 ]
Deng, Hongyan [1 ]
Ye, Xinhua [1 ]
Li, Yong [2 ]
Wang, Jie [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Ultrasound, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Acad Agr Sci, Inst Food Safety & Nutr, 50 Zhongling St, Nanjing 210014, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; REGRESSION; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-42937-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study compared the diagnostic efficiency of benign and malignant breast nodules using ultrasonographic characteristics coupled with several machine-learning models, including logistic regression (Logistics), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), linear support vector machine (Linear SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF). The clinical information and ultrasonographic characteristics of 926 female patients undergoing breast nodule surgery were collected and their relationships were analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The stepwise regression method was used for variable selection and the Monte Carlo cross-validation method was used to randomly divide these nodule cases into training and prediction sets. Our results showed that six independent variables could be used for building models, including age, background echotexture, shape, calcification, resistance index, and axillary lymph node. In the prediction set, Linear SVM had the highest diagnosis rate of benign nodules (0.881), and Logistics, ANN and LDA had the highest diagnosis rate of malignant nodules (0.910 similar to 0.912). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of Linear SVM was the highest (0.890), followed by ANN (0.883), LDA (0.880), Logistics (0.878), RF (0.874), PLS-DA (0.866), and KNN (0.855), all of which were better than that of individual variances. On the whole, the diagnostic efficacy of Linear SVM was better than other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison performance of the CNN-based deep learning models for the distinguishing ultrasound pretreated and microwave dried jujube fruits [J].
Ulu, Banu ;
Gunaydin, Seda ;
Cetin, Necati .
MEASUREMENT, 2025, 249
[42]   Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in benign and malignant breast masses [J].
Tao, Zhoumiao ;
Qi, Hongming ;
Ma, Yifei .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 15 (04) :2870-2877
[43]   Comparison of emergency pediatric breast ultrasound interpretations and management recommendations between pediatric radiologists and breast imaging radiologists [J].
Nguyen, Derek L. ;
Ambinder, Emily B. ;
Mullen, Lisa A. ;
Oluyemi, Eniola T. ;
Dunn, Emily A. .
EMERGENCY RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (06) :987-993
[44]   Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Masses: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using Various Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Parameters [J].
Hirano, Maki ;
Satake, Hiroko ;
Ishigaki, Satoko ;
Ikeda, Mitsuru ;
Kawai, Hisashi ;
Naganawa, Shinji .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) :717-722
[45]   Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm [J].
Lu, Lee-Jane W. ;
Nishino, Thomas K. ;
Johnson, Raleigh F. ;
Nayeem, Fatima ;
Brunder, Donald G. ;
Ju, Hyunsu ;
Leonard, Morton H., Jr. ;
Grady, James J. ;
Khamapirad, Tuenchit .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (21) :6903-6927
[46]   A deep learning-based diagnostic pattern for ultrasound breast imaging: can it reduce unnecessary biopsy? [J].
Zhu, Yi-Cheng ;
Sheng, Jian-Guo ;
Deng, Shu-Hao ;
Jiang, Quan ;
Guo, Jia .
GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (09) :1529-1537
[47]   Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram [J].
Zanello, Paulo Almazy ;
Cica Robim, Andre Felipe ;
Goncalves de Oliveira, Tatiane Mendes ;
Elias Junior, Jorge ;
de Andrade, Jurandyr Moreira ;
Monteiro, Carlos Ribeiro ;
Sarmento Filho, Joaquim Moraes ;
Angotti Carrara, Helio Humberto ;
Muglia, Valdair Francisco .
CLINICS, 2011, 66 (03) :443-448
[48]   A multicenter, hospital-based and non-inferiority study for diagnostic efficacy of automated whole breast ultrasound for breast cancer in China [J].
Xin, Yujing ;
Zhang, Xinyuan ;
Yang, Yi ;
Chen, Yi ;
Wang, Yanan ;
Zhou, Xiang ;
Qiao, Youlin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[49]   Diagnostic Efficacy of Five Different Imaging Modalities in the Assessment of Women Recalled at Breast Screening-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Akwo, Judith ;
Hadadi, Ibrahim ;
Ekpo, Ernest .
CANCERS, 2024, 16 (20)
[50]   Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) Based on the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules and the Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists with Different Diagnostic Experience [J].
Jin, Zhuang ;
Zhu, Yaqiong ;
Zhang, Shijie ;
Xie, Fang ;
Zhang, Mingbo ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Tian, Xiaoqi ;
Zhang, Jue ;
Luo, Yukun ;
Cao, Junying .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26