Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review

被引:2
作者
Jull, Janet [1 ,2 ]
Fairman, Kimberly [3 ]
Oliver, Sandy [4 ]
Hesmer, Brittany [1 ]
Pullattayil, Abdul Kareem [5 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Inst Circumpolar Hlth Res, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
[4] UCL, London, England
[5] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Indigenous; First Nations; Inuit; Metis; Urban Indigenous; Shared decision making; Health; Equity; Systematic review; Framework synthesis; Integrated knowledge translation; Coproduction; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS; SUPPORT FRAMEWORK; CANCER CARE; MODEL; EXPERIENCES; KNOWLEDGE; DEVELOP; WOMEN; INUIT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1186/s13690-023-01177-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundShared decision-making facilitates collaboration between patients and health care providers for informed health decisions. Our review identified interventions to support Indigenous Peoples making health decisions. The objectives were to synthesize evidence and identify factors that impact the use of shared decision making interventions.MethodsAn Inuit and non-Inuit team of service providers and academic researchers used an integrated knowledge translation approach with framework synthesis to coproduce a systematic review. We developed a conceptual framework to organize and describe the shared decision making processes and guide identification of studies that describe interventions to support Indigenous Peoples making health decisions. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases from September 2012 to March 2022, with a grey literature search. Two independent team members screened and quality appraised included studies for strengths and relevance of studies' contributions to shared decision making and Indigenous self-determination. Findings were analyzed descriptively in relation to the conceptual framework and reported using guidelines to ensure transparency and completeness in reporting and for equity-oriented systematic reviews.ResultsOf 5068 citations screened, nine studies reported in ten publications were eligible for inclusion. We categorized the studies into clusters identified as: those inclusive of Indigenous knowledges and governance ("Indigenous-oriented")(n = 6); and those based on Western academic knowledge and governance ("Western-oriented")(n = 3). The studies were found to be of variable quality for contributions to shared decision making and self-determination, with Indigenous-oriented studies of higher quality overall than Western-oriented studies. Four themes are reflected in an updated conceptual framework: 1) where shared decision making takes place impacts decision making opportunities, 2) little is known about the characteristics of health care providers who engage in shared decision making processes, 3) community is a partner in shared decision making, 4) the shared decision making process involves trust-building.ConclusionsThere are few studies that report on and evaluate shared decision making interventions with Indigenous Peoples. Overall, Indigenous-oriented studies sought to make health care systems more amenable to shared decision making for Indigenous Peoples, while Western-oriented studies distanced shared decision making from the health care settings. Further studies that are solutions-focused and support Indigenous self-determination are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [31] Importance of Shared Decision-Making for Vulnerable Populations: Examples from Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Grabinski, Victoria F.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    Lee, Clara N.
    Philpott-Streiff, Sydney E.
    Politi, Mary C.
    [J]. HEALTH EQUITY, 2018, 2 (01) : 234 - 238
  • [32] The Kids Say Project: Supporting Children to Talk about their Experiences and to Engage in Decision-making
    Grace, Rebekah
    Miller, Kim
    Blacklock, Sue
    Bonser, Gillian
    Hayden, Paula
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 71 (03) : 292 - 305
  • [33] Alternative leadership and the pitfalls of hierarchy: When formalization enables power to be tamed
    Gregoire, Maud
    Delalieux, Guillaume
    Fatien, Pauline
    [J]. LEADERSHIP, 2022, 18 (06) : 729 - 753
  • [34] A New Era of Indigenous Research: Community-based Indigenous Research Ethics Protocols in Canada
    Hayward, Ashley
    Sjoblom, Erynne
    Sinclair, Stephanie
    Cidro, Jaime
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 16 (04) : 403 - 417
  • [35] Hoffmann TC, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V348, DOI [10.1136/bmj.g1687, 10.1055/s-0041-111066]
  • [36] Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement
    Huria, Tania
    Palmer, Suetonia C.
    Pitama, Suzanne
    Beckert, Lutz
    Lacey, Cameron
    Ewen, Shaun
    Smith, Linda Tuhiwai
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [37] Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Edwards, Adrian
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 94 (03) : 291 - 309
  • [38] An integrated knowledge translation approach to develop a shared decision-making strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care: a qualitative study
    Jull, J.
    Hizaka, A.
    Sheppard, A. J.
    Kewayosh, A.
    Doering, P.
    MacLeod, L.
    Joudain, G.
    Plourde, J.
    Dorschner, D.
    Rand, M.
    Habash, M.
    Graham, I. D.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (03) : 192 - 204
  • [39] Jull J., 2013, Pimatisiwin - A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, V11, P539
  • [40] Jull J, 2021, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD013385,pub2]