Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review

被引:2
作者
Jull, Janet [1 ,2 ]
Fairman, Kimberly [3 ]
Oliver, Sandy [4 ]
Hesmer, Brittany [1 ]
Pullattayil, Abdul Kareem [5 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Inst Circumpolar Hlth Res, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
[4] UCL, London, England
[5] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Indigenous; First Nations; Inuit; Metis; Urban Indigenous; Shared decision making; Health; Equity; Systematic review; Framework synthesis; Integrated knowledge translation; Coproduction; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS; SUPPORT FRAMEWORK; CANCER CARE; MODEL; EXPERIENCES; KNOWLEDGE; DEVELOP; WOMEN; INUIT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1186/s13690-023-01177-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundShared decision-making facilitates collaboration between patients and health care providers for informed health decisions. Our review identified interventions to support Indigenous Peoples making health decisions. The objectives were to synthesize evidence and identify factors that impact the use of shared decision making interventions.MethodsAn Inuit and non-Inuit team of service providers and academic researchers used an integrated knowledge translation approach with framework synthesis to coproduce a systematic review. We developed a conceptual framework to organize and describe the shared decision making processes and guide identification of studies that describe interventions to support Indigenous Peoples making health decisions. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases from September 2012 to March 2022, with a grey literature search. Two independent team members screened and quality appraised included studies for strengths and relevance of studies' contributions to shared decision making and Indigenous self-determination. Findings were analyzed descriptively in relation to the conceptual framework and reported using guidelines to ensure transparency and completeness in reporting and for equity-oriented systematic reviews.ResultsOf 5068 citations screened, nine studies reported in ten publications were eligible for inclusion. We categorized the studies into clusters identified as: those inclusive of Indigenous knowledges and governance ("Indigenous-oriented")(n = 6); and those based on Western academic knowledge and governance ("Western-oriented")(n = 3). The studies were found to be of variable quality for contributions to shared decision making and self-determination, with Indigenous-oriented studies of higher quality overall than Western-oriented studies. Four themes are reflected in an updated conceptual framework: 1) where shared decision making takes place impacts decision making opportunities, 2) little is known about the characteristics of health care providers who engage in shared decision making processes, 3) community is a partner in shared decision making, 4) the shared decision making process involves trust-building.ConclusionsThere are few studies that report on and evaluate shared decision making interventions with Indigenous Peoples. Overall, Indigenous-oriented studies sought to make health care systems more amenable to shared decision making for Indigenous Peoples, while Western-oriented studies distanced shared decision making from the health care settings. Further studies that are solutions-focused and support Indigenous self-determination are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] The embodiment of inequity - Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada
    Adelson, N
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2005, 96 (Suppl 2): : S45 - S61
  • [2] Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The Lancet-Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study
    Anderson, Ian
    Robson, Bridget
    Connolly, Michele
    Al-Yaman, Fadwa
    Bjertness, Espen
    King, Alexandra
    Tynan, Michael
    Madden, Richard
    Bang, Abhay
    Coimbra, Carlos E. A., Jr.
    Pesantes, Maria Amalia
    Amigo, Hugo
    Andronov, Sergei
    Armien, Blas
    Obando, Daniel Ayala
    Axelsson, Per
    Bhatti, Zaid Shakoor
    Bhutta, Zulfi Qar Ahmed
    Bjerregaard, Peter
    Bjertness, Marius B.
    Briceno-Leon, Roberto
    Broderstad, Ann Ragnhild
    Bustos, Patricia
    Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi
    Chu, Jiayou
    Deji
    Gouda, Jitendra
    Harikumar, Rachakulla
    Htay, Thein Thein
    Htet, Aung Soe
    Izugbara, Chimaraoke
    Kamaka, Martina
    King, Malcolm
    Kodavanti, Mallikharjuna Rao
    Lara, Macarena
    Laxmaiah, Avula
    Lema, Claudia
    Taborda, Ana Maria Leon
    Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan
    Lobanov, Andrey
    Melhus, Marita
    Meshram, Indrapal
    Miranda, J. Jaime
    Mu, Thet Thet
    Nagalla, Balkrishna
    Nimmathota, Arlappa
    Popov, Andrey Ivanovich
    Poveda, Ana Maria Penuela
    Ram, Faujdar
    Reich, Hannah
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 388 (10040) : 131 - 157
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, RECLAIMING POWER PLA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, UN DECL RIGHTS IND P
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, For patient's sake: Patient First review commissioner's report to the Saskatchewan Minister of Health
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, Discussion Paper
  • [7] Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council, Ethial Guidelines for Research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
  • [8] Baciu A, 2017, Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity, V3
  • [9] Battiste M., 2000, RECLAIMING INDIGENOU, pxvi
  • [10] Bowen S, 2013, KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION IN HEALTH CARE: MOVING FROM EVIDENCE TO PRACTICE, 2ND EDITION, P14