Teaching CLIL Courses Entirely in Virtual Reality: Educator Experiences

被引:11
作者
Bonner, Euan [1 ,2 ]
Lege, Ryan [3 ]
Frazier, Erin [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Learning & Teaching Innovat, Chiba, Japan
[2] Kanda Univ, Chiba, Japan
[3] Kanda Univ Int Studies, Chiba, Japan
[4] Meiji Univ, Sch Global Japanese Studies, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
VIRTUAL REALITY (VR); CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL); EDUCATOR EXPERIENCES; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1558/cj.22676
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Virtual reality (VR) has been found to be effective for increasing student motivation and engagement (Parong & Mayer, 2018), experiential learning (Hu-Au & Lee, 2018), and even improving spatial memory (Pollard et al., 2020). However, few studies have moved beyond the novelty of single-lesson VR experiences, nor have they used VR as the primary method of lesson delivery in language learning curricula (Kavanagh et al., 2017). Longitudinal data will help to elucidate a VR-specific pedagogy, providing evidence to support best practices, but they will not necessarily ensure that VR is actually adopted in classroom contexts. For that to take place, teacher buy-in is necessary, but there is also a lack of literature investigating the teacher side of planning and delivering VR lessons. The authors designed a longitudinal case study at a language-focused university, in order to investigate the experiences of university lecturers who conducted eight-week Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) courses in VR using Immerse (www.immerse.online), a multi-user VR language learning platform. The study analyzes teachers' perspectives on planning and implementing a VR curriculum. Post-lesson surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted with the instructors. The analysis findings for both the instructors' experiences will be discussed, along with their implications for integrating VR into extended course curricula.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 67
页数:23
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Teachers' technology use for teaching: Comparing two explanatory mechanisms [J].
Back, Iris ;
Scherer, Ronny ;
Siddiq, Fazilat ;
Lachner, Andreas ;
Scheiter, Katharina .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2021, 104
[2]  
Ball P., 2015, PUTTING CLIL PRACTIC, DOI [10.1093/elt/ccx063, DOI 10.1093/ELT/CCX063]
[3]   Sources of teachers' self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning [J].
Barton, Emily A. ;
Dexter, Sara .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 68 (01) :89-108
[4]  
Brown H., 2017, Transformation in English Education, P328
[5]   Stereotype Threat in Virtual Learning Environments: Effects of Avatar Gender and Sexist Behavior on Women's Math Learning Outcomes [J].
Chang, Felix ;
Luo, Mufan ;
Walton, Gregory ;
Aguilar, Lauren ;
Bailenson, Jeremy .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2019, 22 (10) :634-640
[6]  
Cho Y., 2018, THESIS SYRACUSE U LI
[7]  
Churches A., 2010, Bloom's digital taxonomy
[8]  
Coyle D., 2010, CLIL CONTENT LANGUAG, DOI [10.1016/j.system.2011.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2011.01.001]
[9]   Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers' TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks [J].
Durak, Hatice Yildiz .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, :1136-1162
[10]   Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Myth or Reality? [J].
Elmqaddem, Noureddine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2019, 14 (03) :234-242