The Cognitive Costs of Design Tasks: Examining Cognitive Load Through Verbal and Physical Indicators

被引:0
作者
Calpin, Nicole [1 ]
Menold, Jessica [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Sch Engn Design & Innovat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Sch Engn Design & Innovat, Dept Mech Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
creativity and concept generation; design education; design process; design representation; design theory; design theory and methodology; PRODUCT ANALYSIS MATRIX; COMMUNICATION; EXPERTISE; PROTOTYPE; WORKLOAD; OVERLOAD; MODEL;
D O I
10.1115/1.4062976
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Prior work has demonstrated that design tasks can be cognitively demanding, due to the inherent ambiguity and complexity of design problems. Few studies, however, have examined the evolution of cognitive load during the engineering design process and the linkages between subdimensions of cognitive load and design task outcomes. To address this gap, the current work investigates the evolution of cognitive load across two distinct design tasks: ideation and prototyping, and the relationship between cognitive load and design task outcomes. Results suggest that there is a significant difference in cognitive load experienced by the designer during ideation and prototyping. Additionally, findings suggest that cognitive load during ideation is positively correlated with the uniqueness, usefulness, and elegance of ideas.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Akin O., 1978, Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer Aided Design, P65
  • [2] Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results
    Alexiou, K.
    Zamenopoulos, T.
    Johnson, J. H.
    Gilbert, S. J.
    [J]. DESIGN STUDIES, 2009, 30 (06) : 623 - 647
  • [3] Alzayed M. A., 2020, ASME INT DES ENG TEC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, P HUMAN FACTORS ERGO, DOI DOI 10.1177/1071181312561072
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, ASME 2013 INT DES EN
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1999, Conceptual Design for Engineers
  • [8] Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners
    Atman, Cynthia J.
    Adams, Robin S.
    Cardella, Monica E.
    Turns, Jennifer
    Mosborg, Susan
    Saleem, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) : 359 - 379
  • [9] Aurigemma J., 2013, ASEE Prism, V22, P45
  • [10] When smart groups fail
    Barron, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) : 307 - 359