Ownership or possession? On Bart Wilson's concept of ownership

被引:2
作者
Decker, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Law, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Collateral; GDR land reform; ownership; possession; residue of rights; security;
D O I
10.1017/S174413742200039X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a recent article Wilson explores the origins and explanation of ownership (property) as a custom, and argues that the custom of ownership is the primary concept and that property rights are subordinated to ownership. I argue that Wilson's subordination argument is unpersuasive; the linguistic evidence used by Wilson fits better with the concept of possession; and ownership is not a human universal.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 279
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Decker F., 2016, EIGENTUM ZINS GELDNA, P21
[2]  
Goode R., 1989, PROPRIETARY RIGHTS I
[3]  
Goode Roy., 2004, COMMERCIAL LAW, V3rd
[4]  
Heinsohn G., 1996, Eigentum, Zins und Geld: Ungeloste Ratsel der Wirtschaftswissenschaft
[5]  
Heinsohn Gunnar., 2013, Ownership Economics: On the Foundations of Interest, Money, Markets, Business Cycles and Economic Development
[6]   Much of the 'economics of property rights' devalues property and legal rights [J].
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 11 (04) :683-709
[7]  
Hoernle, 1946, BODENREFORM
[8]  
Honore A., 1961, OXFORD ESSAYS JURISP
[9]  
Pollock F., 1942, HOLMES POLLOCK LETT, P185
[10]  
Pollock Frederick., 1898, HIST ENGLISH LAW TIM, V2nd