Exploring tradeoffs among diet quality and environmental impacts in self-selected diets: a population-based study

被引:2
作者
Mazac, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Hyyrynen, Matti [3 ]
Kaartinen, Niina E. [4 ]
Maennistoe, Satu [4 ]
Irz, Xavier [2 ,5 ]
Hyytiaeinen, Kari [5 ]
Tuomisto, Hanna L. [1 ,6 ]
Lombardini, Chiara [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Dept Agr Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Nat Resource Inst Finland, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Finnish Inst Hlth & Welf, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Dept Econ & Management, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Dietary patterns; FFQ; Health; Multicriteria analysis; Environmental impacts; Sustainability; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NUTRITIONAL QUALITY; FOOD-CONSUMPTION; SUSTAINABILITY; REDUCTION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00394-024-03366-2
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Purpose Proposed sustainable diets often deviate dramatically from currently consumed diets, excluding or drastically reducing entire food groups. Moreover, their environmental sustainability tends to be measured only in terms of greenhouse gases emissions. The aim of this study was to overcome these limitations and identify a cluster of already adopted, relatively healthy diets with substantially lower environmental impacts than the average diet. We also aimed to estimate the reduction in multiple environmental impacts that could be achieved by shifting to this diet cluster and highlight possible tradeoffs among environmental impacts.Methods The diet clusters were identified by applying energy-adjusted multiple factor analysis and hierarchical clustering to the dietary data of the National FinHealth 2017 Study (n = 5125) harmonized with life cycle assessment data on food products from Agribalyse 3.0 and Agri-Footprint using nutrient intakes and global warming potential, land use, and eutrophication of marine and freshwater systems as the active variables.Results We identified five diet clusters, none of which had the highest overall diet quality and lowest impact for all four environmental indicators. One cluster, including twenty percent of the individuals in the sample was identified as a "best compromise" diet with the highest diet quality and the second lowest environmental impacts of all clusters, except for freshwater eutrophication. The cluster did not exclude any food groups, but included more fruits, vegetables, and fish and less of all other animal-source foods than average. Shifting to this cluster diet could raise diet quality while achieving significant reductions in most but not all environmental impacts.Conclusion There are tradeoffs among the environmental impacts of diets. Thus, future dietary analyses should consider multiple sustainability indicators simultaneously. Cluster analysis is a useful tool to help design tailored, socio-culturally acceptable dietary transition paths towards high diet quality and lower environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页码:1663 / 1678
页数:16
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Multiple factor analysis: principal component analysis for multitable and multiblock data sets
    Abdi, Herve
    Williams, Lynne J.
    Valentin, Domininique
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2013, 5 (02) : 149 - 179
  • [2] Plant- and animal-protein diets in relation to sociodemographic drivers, quality, and cost: findings from the Seattle Obesity Study
    Aggarwal, Anju
    Drewnowski, Adam
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 110 (02) : 451 - 460
  • [3] The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review
    Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz
    Green, Rosemary
    Joy, Edward J. M.
    Smith, Pete
    Haines, Andy
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [4] Integrating nutrient bioavailability and co-production links when identifying sustainable diets: How low should we reduce meat consumption?
    Barre, Tangui
    Perignon, Marlene
    Gazan, Rozenn
    Vieux, Florent
    Micard, Valerie
    Amiot, Marie-Josephe
    Darmon, Nicole
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [5] Bjorn A, 2017, MAIN CHARACTERISTICS
  • [6] Blomhoff R., 2023, Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023: Integrating Environmental Aspects
  • [7] Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice
    Clark, Michael
    Tilman, David
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [8] Commission E, 2020, EUR DOES OUR EN COM
  • [9] Healthy diets can create environmental trade-offs, depending on how diet quality is measured
    Conrad, Zach
    Blackstone, Nicole Tichenor
    Roy, Eric D.
    [J]. NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [10] Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions
    Crippa, M.
    Solazzo, E.
    Guizzardi, D.
    Monforti-Ferrario, F.
    Tubiello, F. N.
    Leip, A.
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2021, 2 (03): : 198 - 209