Comparing In-Person and Synchronous Online Training for an Evidence-Based Treatment

Online trainings in evidence-based treatments (EBT) can be effective platforms and may provide better access to community providers as compared with traditional in-person trainings. However, questions remain as to whether online trainings can achieve similar rates of training engagement and model application to traditional in-person trainings. We compared training engagement and model application (e.g., extent of use, fidelity) between participants attending in-person (n = 127) and synchronous online (n = 277) trainings for an EBT (Alternatives for Families: a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; AF-CBT). Data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires and trainers' records. Chi-square analyses and t-tests were used to test for differences between groups. Engagement regarding attendance at workshops and consultation calls was high for both groups, with no significant differences. A total of 81% and 76% presented at least one case and submitted at least one audio recording of an actual AF-CBT session, respectively. Participants rated the training workshop as high quality (M > 4.5/5), and the consultation calls as medium-to-high quality (M > 4/5) across both modalities, indicating good training engagement. In-person training participants were significantly more likely to submit two or more audio recorded sessions than online training participants. This was the only training requirement outcome that differed between the two groups. In examining model application, there were no significant differences between in-person and online training participants in self-reported delivery of AF-CBT, the number of clients with whom it was implemented, the extent they used the model, or the fidelity with which they delivered it. Both groups reported similar improvements in comfort when working with aggressive families, being directive, and using learning techniques like role plays. Online evidence-based treatment skills training appears to be feasible, efficient, and beneficial, with engagement and performance comparable to in-person training. We discuss potential advantages of online training (e.g., fewer costs, greater flexibility for staff from independent practices) and disadvantages (e.g., less satisfaction).