Co-optimization of multiple virtual power plants considering electricity-heat-carbon trading: A Stackelberg game strategy

被引:17
作者
Cao, Jinye [1 ]
Yang, Dechang [1 ]
Dehghanian, Payman [2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] George Washington Univ GWU, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Washington, DC USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Virtual power plant; Stackelberg game; Carbon trading; Demand response; Kriging metamodel; BIDDING STRATEGY; DEMAND RESPONSE; DISPATCH; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109294
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With the improvement of the electricity-heat-carbon trading mechanism, it has been a trend for multiple virtual power plants (MVPP) to participate in the market competition. Firstly, in order to mitigate the burden of environmental pollution and balance the conflicting market interests of MVPP, this paper proposes a Stackelberg game strategy for the operator and MVPP considering a ladder-type carbon price mechanism and a dualcompensated demand response (DR) mechanism, which consists of an optimal pricing strategy for the operator and an optimal energy scheduling strategy for each VPP. During the game process, the operator serves as the leader, guiding the energy transactions of MVPP through price optimization, while each VPP acts as the follower, optimizing the internal aggregated units and loads based on the price issued. To solve the Stackelberg game equilibrium, a Kriging metamodel is then adopted to fit the energy scheduling model of the VPP. Finally, several cases are analyzed to verify that the proposed strategy can effectively contribute to the energy complementation and carbon reduction of MVPP.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Adequacy Assessment of Generating Systems Incorporating Storage Integrated Virtual Power Plants [J].
Bagchi, Arijit ;
Goel, Lalit ;
Wang, Peng .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (03) :3440-3451
[2]   What explains carbon-pricing variation between countries? [J].
Best, Rohan ;
Zhang, Qiu Yue .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 143
[3]   An Exact Double-Oracle Algorithm for Zero-Sum Extensive-Form Games with Imperfect Information [J].
Bosansky, Branislav ;
Kiekintveld, Christopher ;
Lisy, Viliam ;
Pechoucek, Michal .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 51 :829-866
[4]   Two-stage optimization of a virtual power plant incorporating with demand response and energy complementation [J].
Cao, Jinye ;
Zheng, Yingying ;
Han, Xueru ;
Yang, Dechang ;
Yu, Jianshu ;
Tomin, Nikita ;
Dehghanian, Payman .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 :7374-7385
[5]   Spatio-Temporal Kriging Based Economic Dispatch Problem Including Wind Uncertainty [J].
Cuenca Tinitana, Julio Cesar ;
Adrian Correa-Florez, Carlos ;
Patino, Diego ;
Vuelvas, Jose .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
[6]  
Dai Y, 2019, INT T ELECT ENERGY S, P29
[7]   Kriging Assisted Surrogate Evolutionary Computation to Solve Optimal Power Flow Problems [J].
Deng, Zhida ;
Rotaru, Mihai D. ;
Sykulski, Jan K. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (02) :831-839
[8]   Energy Management Optimization of Microgrid Cluster Based on Multi-Agent-System and Hierarchical Stackelberg Game Theory [J].
Dong, Xin ;
Li, Xianshan ;
Cheng, Shan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :206183-206197
[9]   An optimal coordinated planning strategy for distributed energy station based on characteristics of electric vehicle charging behavior under carbon trading mechanism [J].
Gong, Chunyang ;
Yao, Zhili ;
Chen, Hui ;
Huang, Dongmei ;
Wang, Xiaoliang ;
Wang, Zhixin ;
Shi, Shuai .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2023, 147
[10]   Virtual Power Plant Control for Large Residential Communities Using HVAC Systems for Energy Storage [J].
Gong, Huangjie ;
Jones, Evan S. ;
Alden, Rosemary E. ;
Frye, Andrew G. ;
Colliver, Donald ;
Ionel, Dan M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2022, 58 (01) :622-633