The effectiveness of machine learning-based multi-model ensemble predictions of CMIP6 in Western Ghats of India

被引:11
作者
Shetty, Swathi [1 ,2 ]
Umesh, Pruthviraj [1 ]
Shetty, Amba [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Karnataka, Dept Water Resources & Ocean Engn, Mangaluru, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Karnataka, Dept Water Resources & Ocean Engn, Mangaluru 575025, India
关键词
machine learning; multi-model ensemble; TOPSIS ranking; XGBoost; GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS; CLIMATE MODELS; BIAS-CORRECTION; MINIMUM TEMPERATURE; DATA SET; PRECIPITATION; SELECTION; RAINFALL; SIMULATION; RANKING;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8131
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The popularity of cutting-edge machine learning ensemble approaches has solved many climate change research and prediction issues. The six top-performing GCMs obtained from Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution were ensembled using seven machine learning ensemble methods such as Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Linear Regression (LR), Adaptive Boosting Regressor (AdaBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting Regressor (XGBR), Extra Tree Regressor (ETR), Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network (MLP) and simple Arithmetic Mean (AM) over the diverse geo-climatic basins. Precipitation is best simulated by EC-Earth3 and BCC-CSM2-MR. Maximum temperature by MPI-ESM1-2-HR, EC-Earth3-Veg, INM-CM5-0 and MPI-ESM1-2-LR. Minimum temperature by INM-CM5-0 and MPI-ESM1-2-LR model. The MME of XGBR and RFR stand out for their superior performance across all six basins, with exceptional performance over the per-humid basins, while AdaBoost, SVR and the AM underperform. Examining the interseasonal variability of the simulated MMEs over the basins highlights the reliability of these MME models. The anticipated change in maximum and minimum temperature in the SSP245 and SSP585 in the future horizon corroborates the undeniable rise in temperature by all the MMEs with a dramatic change in future temperature in AM and AdaBoost in precipitation with a factor of two rises in the far future over the recent past. Though climate change is expected to increase precipitation, atmospheric stabilization over the Ghats will affect the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation. We recommend a comprehensive testing and validation approach to generate ensembles in regional investigations involving complicated and diverse precipitation mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:5029 / 5054
页数:26
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [41] A New Methodology for Reference Evapotranspiration Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis under Climate Change Conditions Based on Machine Learning, Multi Criteria Decision Making and Monte Carlo Methods
    Kadkhodazadeh, Mojtaba
    Valikhan Anaraki, Mahdi
    Morshed-Bozorgdel, Amirreza
    Farzin, Saeed
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [42] Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models
    Knutti, Reto
    Furrer, Reinhard
    Tebaldi, Claudia
    Cermak, Jan
    Meehl, Gerald A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2010, 23 (10) : 2739 - 2758
  • [43] Evaluation of CMIP6 models for simulations of surplus/deficit summer monsoon conditions over India
    Konda, Gopinadh
    Vissa, Naresh Krishna
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2023, 60 (3-4) : 1023 - 1042
  • [44] Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation
    Legates, DR
    McCabe, GJ
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (01) : 233 - 241
  • [45] Machine learning to optimize climate projection over China with multi-model ensemble simulations
    Li, Tong
    Jiang, Zhihong
    Treut, Herve Le
    Li, Laurent
    Zhao, Lilong
    Ge, Lingling
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (09)
  • [46] Future changes of global potential evapotranspiration simulated from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models
    Liu, Xinlei
    Li, Chunxiang
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Han, Lin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 568 - 575
  • [47] Selecting representative climate models for climate change impact studies: an advanced envelope-based selection approach
    Lutz, Arthur F.
    ter Maat, Herbert W.
    Biemans, Hester
    Shrestha, Arun B.
    Wester, Philippus
    Immerzeel, Walter W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (12) : 3988 - 4005
  • [48] Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue
    Maraun, Douglas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (06) : 2137 - 2143
  • [49] Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2
    Mauritsen, Thorsten
    Bader, Jurgen
    Becker, Tobias
    Behrens, Jorg
    Bittner, Matthias
    Brokopf, Renate
    Brovkin, Victor
    Claussen, Martin
    Crueger, Traute
    Esch, Monika
    Fast, Irina
    Fiedler, Stephanie
    Flaeschner, Dagmar
    Gayler, Veronika
    Giorgetta, Marco
    Goll, Daniel S.
    Haak, Helmuth
    Hagemann, Stefan
    Hedemann, Christopher
    Hohenegger, Cathy
    Ilyina, Tatiana
    Jahns, Thomas
    Jimenez-de-la-Cuesta, Diego
    Jungclaus, Johann
    Kleinen, Thomas
    Kloster, Silvia
    Kracher, Daniela
    Kinne, Stefan
    Kleberg, Deike
    Lasslop, Gitta
    Kornblueh, Luis
    Marotzke, Jochem
    Matei, Daniela
    Meraner, Katharina
    Mikolajewicz, Uwe
    Modali, Kameswarrao
    Moebis, Benjamin
    Muellner, Wolfgang A.
    Nabel, Julia E. M. S.
    Nam, Christine C. W.
    Notz, Dirk
    Nyawira, Sarah-Sylvia
    Paulsen, Hanna
    Peters, Karsten
    Pincus, Robert
    Pohlmann, Holger
    Pongratz, Julia
    Popp, Max
    Raddatz, Thomas Jurgen
    Rast, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (04) : 998 - 1038
  • [50] Ranking the AR4 climate models over the Murray-Darling Basin using simulated maximum temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation
    Maxino, C. C.
    McAvaney, B. J.
    Pitman, A. J.
    Perkins, S. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2008, 28 (08) : 1097 - 1112