For the love of money and the planet: Experimental evidence on co-benefits framing and food waste reduction intentions

被引:12
作者
Prelez, Juliana [1 ]
Wang, Feiyang [1 ]
Shreedhar, Ganga [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Psychol & Behav Sci, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
Framing; Co-benefits; Food waste intentions; Nudge; Randomized controlled trial; Extended theory of planned behavior; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; EXTENDED THEORY; INCENTIVES; MONETARY; BARRIERS; LESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106904
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This randomized control trial examines the effect of informational nudges highlighting the monetary or envi-ronmental benefits, or co-benefits, of food-saving behaviors on intentions to reduce food waste within the framework of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior (ETPB). A representative sample of Spanish participants (N = 1008) were exposed to control, monetary, environmental, or co-benefits conditions and asked to indicate their intentions to reduce household fruit and vegetable waste. Psychological, behavioral, and situational ETPB factors affecting food waste behavior were also measured. Only co-benefits framing was found to have a sig-nificant effect. Participants who were highly concerned about the environmental impact of wasting food were more strongly influenced by the co-benefits and monetary framings. Further, perceived behavioral control and food waste habits were positively associated with food-saving intentions. Thus, co-benefits framing in infor-mational nudges can strengthen consumer intention to reduce fruit and vegetable waste, especially among consumers with higher levels of environmental concern.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Finding the Critical Cue: Implementation Intentions to Change One's Diet Work Best When Tailored to Personally Relevant Reasons for Unhealthy Eating
    Adriaanse, Marieke A.
    de Ridder, Denise T. D.
    de Wit, John B. F.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (01) : 60 - 71
  • [2] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, FOOD WASTAGE FOOTPRI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, ROUTLEDGE HDB RELIG
  • [5] Nonprice incentives and energy conservation
    Asensio, Omar I.
    Delmas, Magali A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (06) : E510 - E515
  • [6] Bain PG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P154, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2814, 10.1038/nclimate2814]
  • [7] Bernauer T, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P680, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2948, 10.1038/nclimate2948]
  • [8] The Squander Sequence: Understanding Food Waste at Each Stage of the Consumer Decision-Making Process
    Block, Lauren G.
    Keller, Punam A.
    Vallen, Beth
    Williamson, Sara
    Birau, Mia M.
    Grinstein, Amir
    Haws, Kelly L.
    LaBarge, Monica C.
    Lamberton, Cait
    Moore, Elizabeth S.
    Moscato, Emily M.
    Reczek, Rebecca Walker
    Tangari, Andrea Heintz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 2016, 35 (02) : 292 - 304
  • [9] Bolderdijk JW, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P413, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1767, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1767]
  • [10] Factors affecting household food waste among young consumers and actions to prevent it. A comparison among UK, Spain and Italy
    Bravi, Laura
    Francioni, Barbara
    Murmura, Federica
    Savelli, Elisabetta
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 153