Sandstone groundwater salinization modelling using physicochemical variables in Southern Saudi Arabia: Application of novel data intelligent algorithms

被引:25
作者
Abba, S. I. [1 ]
Benaafi, Mohammed [1 ]
Usman, A. G. [2 ,3 ]
Aljundi, Isam H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Near East Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Analyt Chem, TRNC, Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkiye
[3] Near East Univ, Operat Res Ctr Healthcare, Nicosia, Cyprus
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Chem Engn, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Aquifer; Artificial Intelligence; Electrical Conductivity; Groundwater; Salinization; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION; DISSOLVED-OXYGEN; PREDICTION; HYBRIDIZATION; ANFIS; SVM; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.asej.2022.101894
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Reliable modelling and simulation of groundwater management are crucial for sustainable development. Groundwater salinization is considered challenging and has recently led to the development of several emerging advancements and technologies, which grant a feasible solution to integrated water management and desalination processes. For this purpose, Electrical Conductivity (EC) as the early Salinization sign is modelled using various computational techniques, namely, Least Square-boost (LSQ-Boost), Gaussian Process regression (GPR), support vector regression (SVR) and stepwise linear regression (SWLR). The experiment data from sandstone aquifers include parameters from the physical, chemical and hydrogeochemical aspects. Four different input combinations (C1-C4) were developed using linear and ranking nonlinear feature selection and validated modelling results weres assessed by mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root means square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and correlation coefficient (R). The analysis also considers the effect of multicollinearity, and the variables affected, such as TDS (mg/L), were not included in the first three combinations. The novel GPR proved superior to other models, with GPR-C1 justified quantitatively (MSE = 0.0255, MAE = 25260.49 and RMSE = 0.1595) in the verification phase. Other intelligent models (SVR, LSQ-Boost) depicted promising for C3 and C4 combinations with more than 88-90% predictive accuracy. The explored novel GPR algorithm offered an excellent and reliable EC prediction tool. The study also suggested using direct correlated positive variables, including hydrochemical and topographic factors, in modelling groundwater salinization. This would lead to more effective water-resources-related planning and decision making.(c) 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Evolutionary computational intelligence algorithm coupled with self-tuning predictive model for water quality index determination [J].
Abba, S., I ;
Hadi, Sinan Jasim ;
Sammen, Saad Sh ;
Salih, Sinan Q. ;
Abdulkadir, R. A. ;
Quoc Bao Pham ;
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 587
[2]  
Alagha JS, 2017, HYDROGEOL J, V25, P2347, DOI 10.1007/s10040-017-1658-1
[3]  
Anteneh Belayneh Anteneh Belayneh, 2013, Journal of Water and Land Development, P3
[4]   Application of wavelet-artificial intelligence hybrid models for water quality prediction: a case study in Aji-Chay River, Iran [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (07) :1797-1819
[5]   Hydrochemical and Isotopic Investigation of the Groundwater from Wajid Aquifer in Wadi Al-Dawasir, Southern Saudi Arabia [J].
Benaafi, Mohammed ;
Al-Shaibani, Abdulaziz .
WATER, 2021, 13 (13)
[6]   Lake Water-Level fluctuations forecasting using Minimax Probability Machine Regression, Relevance Vector Machine, Gaussian Process Regression, and Extreme Learning Machine [J].
Bonakdari, Hossein ;
Ebtehaj, Isa ;
Samui, Pijush ;
Gharabaghi, Bahram .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (11) :3965-3984
[7]   Identification of support vector machines for runoff modelling [J].
Bray, M ;
Han, D .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2004, 6 (04) :265-280
[8]   Gaussian Process Regression for numerical wind speed prediction enhancement [J].
Cai, Haoshu ;
Jia, Xiaodong ;
Feng, Jianshe ;
Li, Wenzhe ;
Hsu, Yuan-Ming ;
Lee, Jay .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 :2112-2123
[9]   Downscaling GCMs using the Smooth Support Vector Machine method to predict daily precipitation in the Hanjiang Basin [J].
Chen Hua ;
Guo Jing ;
Xiong Wei ;
Guo Shenglian ;
Xu, Chong-Yu .
ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2010, 27 (02) :274-284
[10]   Groundwater Level Prediction Using SOM-RBFN Multisite Model [J].
Chen, Lu-Hsien ;
Chen, Ching-Tien ;
Pan, Yan-Gu .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (08) :624-631