Will cultured meat be served on Chinese tables? A study of consumer attitudes and intentions about cultured meat in China

被引:22
作者
Li, Haoran [1 ]
Van Loo, Ellen J. [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ]
Chen, Juhui [2 ]
Bai, Junfei [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Social Sci, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] China Agr Univ, Beijing Food Safety Policy & Strategy Res Base, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 17 Qinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Cultured meat; Artificial meat; Cell-based meat; Lab meat; In-vitro meat; Consumer attitude; Framing effect; Information effect; ACCEPTANCE; FOOD; TECHNOLOGY; EAT; PREFERENCES; CHALLENGES; PROSPECTS; IMPLICIT; EXPLICIT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.109081
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This research investigates the attitudes and intentions of Chinese consumers about cultured "meat" (CM). We also investigate framing effects through the names used for these products ("cultured meat," "artificial meat," and "cell-based meat") and the effect of information provision. Of the 1532 consumers in our sample, most had not heard of "cultured meat" or "cell-based meat" before, although 70% had heard of "artificial meat". Around 44% of the participants indicated that they would be willing to try CM, and 32% would be likely to purchase it. Participants disliked the terms "cultured meat" and "cell-based meat" less than they disliked the term "artificial meat," although the latter was the most familiar to them. The provision of neutral information on the production process increased consumer support for CM, but the effect was limited. Prior knowledge and naming terms were strong predictors of attitudes and willingness to buy. A key implication is that stakeholders should cautiously apply framing strategies when introducing CM to the public.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   Are consumers willing to pay for in-vitro meat? An investigation of naming effects [J].
Asioli, Daniele ;
Bazzani, Claudia ;
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 73 (02) :356-375
[3]   Stuck in the middle with you: The role of similarity information on categorizing cultured meat [J].
Bekker, Gerben A. ;
Fischer, Arnout R. H. ;
Tobi, Hilde ;
van Trijp, Hans C. M. .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2021, 93
[4]   Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat [J].
Bekker, Gerben A. ;
Fischer, Arnout R. H. ;
Tobi, Hilde ;
van Trijp, Hans C. M. .
APPETITE, 2017, 108 :245-254
[5]   Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018-2020) [J].
Bryant, Christopher ;
Barnett, Julie .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (15)
[6]   The Impact of Framing on Acceptance of Cultured Meat [J].
Bryant, Christopher ;
Dillard, Courtney .
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2019, 6
[7]   A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China [J].
Bryant, Christopher ;
Szejda, Keri ;
Parekh, Nishant ;
Desphande, Varun ;
Tse, Brian .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 3
[8]   Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review [J].
Bryant, Christopher ;
Barnett, Julie .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 143 :8-17
[9]   Strategies for overcoming aversion to unnaturalness: The case of clean meat [J].
Bryant, Christopher J. ;
Anderson, Joanna E. ;
Asher, Kathryn E. ;
Green, Che ;
Gasteratos, Kristopher .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2019, 154 :37-45
[10]   What's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names [J].
Bryant, Christopher J. ;
Barnett, Julie C. .
APPETITE, 2019, 137 :104-113