Muller misled the Pugwash Conference on radiation risks

被引:3
作者
Calabrese, Edward J. [1 ,3 ]
Selby, Paul B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Sci, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Amherst, MA USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Sci, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
Atomic bombs; cancer; dose response; ionizing radiation; mutation; scientific misconduct; FINDINGS EXPOSED FLAWS; CANCER-RISK; LNT; THRESHOLD; MODEL; LINEARITY; MUTATIONS; LEUKEMIA; HISTORY; BECAME;
D O I
10.1080/15459624.2023.2268664
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Pugwash Conferences have been a highly visible attempt to create profoundly important discussions on matters related to global safety and security at the highest levels, starting in 1957 at the height of the Cold War. This paper assesses, for the first time, the formal comments offered at this first Pugwash Conference by the Nobel Prize-winning radiation geneticist, Hermann J. Muller, on the effects of ionizing radiation on the human genome. This analysis shows that the presentation by Muller was highly biased and contained scientific errors and misrepresentations of the scientific record that resulted in seriously misleading the attendees. The presentation of Muller at Pugwash served to promote, on a very visible global scale, continued misrepresentations of the state of the science and had a significant impact on policies and practices internationally and both scientific and personal belief systems concerning the effects of low dose radiation on human health. These misrepresentations would come to affect the adoption and use of nuclear technologies and the science of radiological and chemical carcinogen health risk assessment, ultimately having a profound effect on global environmental health.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   CARCINOGEN RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE US ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-AGENCY [J].
ALBERT, RE .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 24 (01) :75-85
[2]   Manhattan Project genetic studies: Flawed research discredits LNT recommendations [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. ;
Agathokleous, Evgenios ;
Giordano, James ;
Selby, Paul B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 319
[3]   Linear non-threshold (LNT) fails numerous toxicological stress tests: Implications for continued policy use [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2022, 365
[4]   Key historical study findings questioned in debate over threshold versus linear non-threshold for cancer risk assessment [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2022, 359
[5]   Cover up and cancer risk assessment: Prominent US scientists suppressed evidence to promote adoption of LNT [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. ;
Selby, Paul B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 210
[6]   LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 197
[7]   LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 2: How unsound LNT science became accepted [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 197
[8]   The Muller-Neel dispute and the fate of cancer risk assessment [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 190
[9]   EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2019, 308 :110-112
[10]   The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2019, 301 :6-25