Interface formulation for generalized finite difference method for solving groundwater flow

被引:1
|
作者
Chavez-Negrete, C. [1 ]
Dominguez-Mota, F. J. [2 ]
Roman-Gutierrez, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] UMSNH, Fac Ingn Civil, Edificio C,Ciudad Univ, Morelia 58040, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] UMSNH, Fac Ciencias Fisico Matemat, Edificio B,Ciudad Univ, Morelia 58040, Michoacan, Mexico
关键词
Layered materials; Generalized finite differences; Interface balance; Richards equation; Discontinuous coefficients; DIMENSIONAL UNSATURATED FLOW; NUMERICAL-SOLUTION; RICHARDS EQUATION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105990
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Simulation of realistic groundwater flow phenomena in unsaturated porous layered media needs to consider all the environmental features that influence the governing equation of the dynamics of the process, namely, the Richards equation. In the stationary case, the latter is a nonlinear parabolic expression whose numerical solution requires an adequate discretization of the differential operator for approximating its solution accurately to avoid numerical inaccuracies that yield unrealistic numerical oscillations between soil layers. A reliable spatial discretization can be obtained via a generalized finite differences scheme used as a meshless method, which allows the pose of discrete expressions for differential operators, including the discontinuous coefficients that describe the changes in permeability in different media. The key idea is to use a frontier nodal balance expression written so that the amount of water is conserved at the interface nodes. The proposed discretization's robustness and accuracy are demonstrated by presenting several benchmark problems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Solving Monge-Ampere equation in 2D and 3D by Generalized Finite Difference Method
    Benito, J. J.
    Garcia, A.
    Gavete, L.
    Negreanu, M.
    Urena, F.
    Vargas, A. M.
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2021, 124 (124) : 52 - 63
  • [22] Solving the telegraph equation in 2-D and 3-D using generalized finite difference method (GFDM)
    Urena, F.
    Gavete, L.
    Benito, J. J.
    Garcia, A.
    Vargas, A. M.
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2020, 112 : 13 - 24
  • [23] A note on the dynamic analysis using the generalized finite difference method
    Gavete, L.
    Urena, F.
    Benito, J. J.
    Salete, E.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2013, 252 : 132 - 147
  • [24] Consistency conditions for the influence graphs generalized finite difference method
    Payre, G. M. J.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 198 (33-36) : 2565 - 2575
  • [25] AN IMPROVED NON-TRADITIONAL FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR SOLVING THE ELLIPTIC INTERFACE PROBLEMS
    Wang, Liqun
    Hou, Songming
    Shi, Liwei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 2014, 32 (01) : 39 - 57
  • [26] Fourth-order finite difference method for solving Burgers' equation
    Hassanien, IA
    Salama, AA
    Hosham, HA
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 170 (02) : 781 - 800
  • [27] Generalized Finite-Difference Time-Domain method with absorbing boundary conditions for solving the nonlinear Schrodinger equation on a GPU
    Wilson, Joshua P.
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 235 : 279 - 292
  • [28] Generalized finite difference method based meshless analysis for coupled two-phase porous flow and geomechanics
    Liu, Yina
    Rao, Xiang
    Zhao, Hui
    Zhan, Wentao
    Xu, Yunfeng
    Liu, Yuan
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2023, 146 : 184 - 203
  • [29] A Finite-Difference Scheme for the Generalized Diffuse Interface Model of the Electrical Breakdown Process
    A. S. Ponomarev
    E. V. Zipunova
    Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 2024, 16 (Suppl 1) : S105 - S118
  • [30] Solving the Fokker-Planck equation via the compact finite difference method
    Sepehrian, Behnam
    Radpoor, Marzieh Karimi
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, 2020, 8 (03): : 493 - 504