Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia

被引:7
|
作者
Khan, Sana [1 ]
Bartley, Rebecca [2 ]
Kinsey-Henderson, Anne [1 ]
Hawdon, Aaron [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Environm, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas 4814, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Environm, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
Digital elevation models; (dis)connectivity; Restoration; Geomorphic change detection; Geomorphic effectiveness; GIS; GRAVEL-BED; MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE; DEPOSITION VOLUMES; FINE SEDIMENT; IMPACTS; RIVER; QUEENSLAND; AIRBORNE; INSIGHTS; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabili-tation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2-3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha-1 y-1) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha-1 y-1) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha-1 y-1). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from-68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to-60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and addi-tional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabil-itation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments. (c) 2023 International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation, China Water and Power Press, and China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 199
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Response to comment by Daley et al., on "Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia"
    Khan, Sana
    Bartley, Rebecca
    Kinsey-Henderson, Anne
    Hawdon, Aaron
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2024, 12 (03) : 741 - 745
  • [2] Comment on "Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia" by Khan et al., 2023
    Daley, James S.
    Brooks, Andrew P.
    Spencer, John R.
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2024, 12 (02) : 481 - 486
  • [3] Agricultural development risks increasing gully erosion and cumulative sediment yields from headwater streams in Great Barrier Reef catchments
    Shellberg, Jeffrey G.
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (03) : 1555 - 1569
  • [4] Prioritising gully remediation in a Great Barrier Reef catchment: An approach using two independent methods of assessing erosion activity in 22,300 gullies
    Daley, James S.
    Stout, Justin C.
    Brooks, Andrew P.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 357
  • [5] Linking hydrological connectivity to gully erosion in savanna rangelands tributary to the Great Barrier Reef using structure-from-motion photogrammetry
    Koci, Jack
    Sidle, Roy C.
    Jarihani, Ben
    Cashman, Matthew J.
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 31 (01) : 20 - 36
  • [6] Criteria for effective regional scale catchment to reef management: A case study of Australia's Great Barrier Reef
    Creighton, Colin
    Waterhouse, Jane
    Day, Jon C.
    Brodie, Jon
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2021, 173
  • [7] A Bayesian approach to understanding the key factors influencing temporal variability in stream water quality - a case study in the Great Barrier Reef catchments
    Liu, Shuci
    Ryu, Dongryeol
    Webb, J. Angus
    Lintern, Anna
    Guo, Danlu
    Waters, David
    Western, Andrew W.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (05) : 2663 - 2683
  • [8] Assessing the repeatability of terrestrial laser scanning for monitoring gully topography: A case study from Aratula, Queensland, Australia
    Goodwin, Nicholas Robert
    Armston, John
    Stiller, Isaac
    Muir, Jasmine
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2016, 262 : 24 - 36
  • [9] Refining fine sediment source identification through integration of spatial modelling, concentration monitoring and source tracing: A case study in the Great Barrier Reef catchments
    Bainbridge, Zoe
    Olley, Jon
    Wilkinson, Scott
    Bartley, Rebecca
    Lewis, Stephen
    Dougall, Cameron
    Khan, Sana
    Kuhnert, Petra
    Burton, Joanne
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 892
  • [10] Alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon exports from tropical and subtropical river catchments discharging to the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Rosentreter, Judith A.
    Eyre, Bradley D.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2020, 34 (07) : 1530 - 1544