D-dimer levels to exclude pulmonary embolism and reduce the need for CT angiography in COVID-19 in an outpatient population

被引:3
|
作者
Kovacs, Anita [1 ]
Hantosi, Dora [1 ]
Szabo, Nikoletta [2 ]
Letoha, Annamaria [3 ]
Lengyel, Csaba [3 ]
Foldesi, Imre [4 ]
Burian, Katalin [5 ]
Palko, Andras [1 ]
Vereb, Daniel [1 ]
Kincses, Zsigmond Tamas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Ctr, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Szeged, Hungary
[2] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Ctr, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Szeged, Hungary
[3] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Ctr, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Szeged, Hungary
[4] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Ctr, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Sch, Dept Lab Med, Szeged, Hungary
[5] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Ctr, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med Sch, Dept Med Microbiol, Szeged, Hungary
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
COMPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0297023
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives Emerging results indicate that, in COVID-19, thromboembolic complications contribute to the high mortality and morbidity. Previous research showed that the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) is between 25-50% in COVID-19 patients, however, most of these reports are based on data from patients with severe pneumonia, treated in intensive care units. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center, observational study to estimate the prevalence of PE in COVID-19 patients who underwent CT angiography and to identify the most important predictors. Adult outpatients with COVID-19, who presented at our COVID Outpatient Clinic between 1(st) and 31(st) of March in 2021 and underwent CTA examination were included in this study. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PE in COVID-19 patients. The predictors were: age, gender, disease duration, CT severity index and log-transformed quantitative D-dimer (logQDDIM) value. Results 843 COVID-19 patients were included into the study. 82.56% (693 patients) of the infected patients had a pulmonary CTA examination and D-dimer levels (mean age: 59.82 years +/- 15.66). 7.61% (53 patients) of the patients had PE. 2.02% (14 patients) of the patients had main branch or lobar PE. The multiple regression analysis found that only logQDDIM was a significant predictor. A logQDDIM cut-off value of 0.0169 (1.0171 ug/ml serum D-dimer) predicted PE with 99% sensitivity (p<0.0001, degree-of-freedom = 570, AUC = 0.72). Conclusions We demonstrated in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients that a cut-off value of QDDIM of 1ug/ml can exclude pulmonary embolism in an outpatient setting, implicating that QDDIM might potentially supersede CTA as a screening approach in COVID-19 outpatient clinics.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism
    Tick, L. W.
    Nijkeuter, M.
    Kramer, M. H. H.
    Hovens, M. M. C.
    Bueller, H. R.
    Leebeek, F. W. G.
    Huisman, M. V.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 264 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [12] Clinical usefulness and safety of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to exclude pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis
    Julio Flores
    Jaime García de Tena
    Javier Galipienzo
    Ángel García-Avello
    Esteban Pérez-Rodríguez
    José Ignacio Tortuero
    Concepción Álvarez
    Antonio Ruíz
    Ignacio Arribas
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2016, 11 : 69 - 75
  • [13] Clinical usefulness and safety of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to exclude pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis
    Flores, Julio
    Garcia de Tena, Jaime
    Galipienzo, Javier
    Garcia-Avello, Angel
    Perez-Rodriguez, Esteban
    Ignacio Tortuero, Jose
    Alvarez, Concepcion
    Ruiz, Antonio
    Arribas, Ignacio
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [14] An optimized D-dimer cut-off value to predict pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study
    Engels, S.
    Van Veen, I
    Oudkerk, M.
    Van der Palen, J.
    Heuvelmans, M.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [15] Age-adjusted versus clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism
    Lapner, Sarah Takach
    Stevens, Scott M.
    Woller, Scott C.
    Snow, Gregory
    Kearon, Clive
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2018, 167 : 15 - 19
  • [16] Role of CT angiography in detecting acute pulmonary embolism associated with COVID-19 pneumonia
    Masselli, Gabriele
    Almberger, Maria
    Tortora, Alessandra
    Capoccia, Lucia
    Dolciami, Miriam
    D'Aprile, Maria Rosaria
    Valentini, Cristina
    Avventurieri, Giacinta
    Bracci, Stefano
    Ricci, Paolo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (12): : 1553 - 1560
  • [17] Rapid D-Dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism:: Current status and new developments
    Janssen, MCH
    Wollersheim, H
    Verbruggen, B
    Nováková, IRO
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1998, 24 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [18] Comparison of the age-adjusted and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in the ED
    Sharif, Sameer
    Eventov, Michelle
    Kearon, Clive
    Parpia, Sameer
    Li, Meirui
    Jiang, River
    Sneath, Paula
    Fuentes, Carmen Otero
    Marriott, Christopher
    de Wit, Kerstin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (05) : 845 - 850
  • [19] D-dimer: old dogmas, new (COVID-19) tricks
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Mullier, Francois
    Favaloro, Emmanuel J.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 61 (05) : 841 - 850
  • [20] Should the cut-off value of D-dimer be elevated to exclude pulmonary embolism in acute exacerbation of COPD?
    Akpinar, Evrim Eylem
    Hosgun, Derya
    Doganay, Beyza
    Atac, Gokce Kaan
    Gulhan, Meral
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2013, 5 (04) : 430 - 434