Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery is a safe and effective pathway for older patients: a pooling up analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Xu-Rui [1 ]
Liu, Xiao-Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Bin [1 ]
Liu, Fei [1 ]
Li, Zi-Wei [1 ]
Yuan, Chao [1 ]
Wei, Zheng-Qiang [1 ]
Peng, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal surgery; Colorectal cancer; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Older; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; COLONIC SURGERY; CANCER; PROTOCOL; ERAS; METAANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04377-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe current study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of Enhanced Recovery after surgery (ERAS) in older patients undergoing colorectal surgery.MethodsThree databases including PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were used for searching eligible studies on Jun 8(th),2022. To evaluate the effect of ERAS, we focused on the short-term outcomes including postoperative complications and recovery. Subgroup analysis was also conducted for patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. All the data processing and analyses were carried out by Stata (V.16.0) software.ResultsFinally, there were fourteen studies involving 5961 patients enrolled in this study. As for surgical outcomes, we found that the older group had more overall complications (OR = 1.41, I-2 = 36.59%, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.65, P = 0.00), more obstruction (OR = 1.462, I-2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 1.037 to 2.061, P = 0.0304), more respiratory complications (OR = 1.721, I-2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 1.177 to 2.515, P = 0.0051), more cardiovascular complications (OR = 3.361, I-2 = 57.72%, 95% CI = 1.072 to 10.542, P = 0.0377), more urinary complications (OR = 1.639, I-2 = 37.63%, 95% CI = 1.168 to 2.299, P = 0.0043), less readmission (OR = 0.662, I-2 = 44.48%, 95% CI = 0.484 to 0.906, P = 0.0100), higher mortality (OR = 0.662, I-2 = 44.48%, 95% CI = 0.484 to 0.906, P = 0.0100), and longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.21, I-2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 0.566 to 1.859, P = 0.0002)). Subgroup analysis also found that older CRC patients had a higher risk of overall complications (OR = 1.37, I-2 = 37.51%, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.78, P < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough ERAS could accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce postoperative complications, older patients who received ERAS still had higher complication incidence than younger patients. Although the proportion of re-hospitalizations was lower and the OS was better, doctors could not rely too much on ERAS. More measures were needed to improve the outcomes of colorectal surgery in older patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in older adults following colorectal resection
    Cathomas, Marionna
    Taha, Anas
    Kunst, Nicole
    Burri, Emanuel
    Vetter, Marcus
    Galli, Raffaele
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Heigl, Andres
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (08)
  • [42] Fast-track Surgery in Real Life: How Patient Factors Influence Outcomes and Compliance With an Enhanced Recovery Clinical Pathway After Colorectal Surgery
    Feroci, Francesco
    Lenzi, Elisa
    Baraghini, Maddalena
    Garzi, Alessia
    Vannucchi, Andrea
    Cantafio, Stefano
    Scatizzi, Marco
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03) : 259 - 265
  • [43] Enhanced recovery Pathways in gynecologic surgery: Are they safe and effective in the elderly?
    Lee, Sarah S.
    Chern, Jing-Yi
    Frey, Melissa K.
    Comfort, Ashley
    Lee, Jessica
    Roselli, Nicole
    Boyd, Leslie R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 38
  • [44] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is safe, feasible and effective in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a prospective single center study
    Crucitti, Antonio
    Mazzari, Andrea
    Tomaiuolo, Pasquina M.
    Dionisi, Paolo
    Diamanti, Paolo
    Di Flumeri, Giada
    Donini, Lorenzo M.
    Bossola, Maurizio
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2020, 75 (03) : 157 - 163
  • [45] Learning curve of enhanced recovery after surgery program in open colorectal surgery
    Lohsiriwat, Varut
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 11 (03): : 169 - 178
  • [46] Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery Program Dedicated to Elderly Patients After Colorectal Surgery
    Ostermann, Sandrine
    Morel, Philippe
    Chale, Jean-Jacques
    Bucher, Pascal
    Konrad, Beatrice
    Meier, Raphael P. H.
    Ris, Frederic
    Schiffer, Eduardo R. C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (09) : 1105 - 1116
  • [47] Energy and Protein Intake After Return Home in Colorectal Surgery Patients With an Enhanced Recovery Program: A Prospective Observational Study
    Hubert, Megane
    Gabriel, Dominique
    El Khouda, Soraya
    Coster, Marine
    Routiaux, Clara
    Hans, Gregory
    Nihant, Nicole
    Joris, Jean
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 36 (03) : 639 - 647
  • [48] Enhanced Recovery after Colorectal Surgery: Can We Afford Not to Use It?
    Jung, Andrew D.
    Dhar, Vikrom K.
    Hoehn, Richard S.
    Atkinson, Sarah J.
    Johnson, Bobby L.
    Rice, Teresa
    Snyder, Jonathan R.
    Rafferty, Janice F.
    Edwards, Michael J.
    Paquette, Ian M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (04) : 586 - 593
  • [49] Improved outcomes with implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in the Philippines
    Tampo, Mayou Martin T.
    Onglao, Mark Augustine S.
    Lopez, Marc Paul J.
    Sacdalan, Marie Dione P.
    Cruz, Ma Concepcion L.
    Apellido, Rosielyn T.
    Monroy, Hermogenes J., III
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 38 (02) : 109 - +
  • [50] Attitudes of patients and care providers to enhanced recovery after surgery programs after major abdominal surgery
    Hughes, Michael
    Coolsen, Marielle M. E.
    Aahlin, Eirik K.
    Harrison, Ewen M.
    McNally, Stephen J.
    Dejong, C. H. C.
    Lassen, Kristoffer
    Wigmore, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 193 (01) : 102 - 110