Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial

被引:6
作者
Vaishnavi, B. D. [1 ]
Goyal, Shilpa [1 ]
Sharma, Ankur [1 ]
Kothari, Nikhil [1 ]
Kaloria, Narendra [2 ]
Sethi, Priyanka [1 ]
Bhatia, Pradeep [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Jodhpur, India
[2] PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
关键词
separation anxiety; children; dexmedetomidine; midazolam; ketamine; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.5114/ait.2023.129276
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Paediatric patients are a population with a high level of anxiety. The pre-vention of perioperative stress in a frightened child is important to render the child calm and cooperative for smoother induction. Intranasal premedication is easy and safe, and the drug is rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation, ensuring early onset of seda-tion in children and good effectiveness.Methods: 150 patients in the age group 2-4 years, ASA class I, undergoing elec-tive surgical procedures were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: a DM group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 & mu;g kg-1 and midazolam 0.12 mg kg-1), a DK group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 & mu;g kg-1 and keta-mine 2 mg kg-1), and an MK group (receiving intranasal midazolam 0.12 mg kg-1 and ketamine 2 mg kg-1). After 30 minutes of administration of the drugs, the patients were assessed for parent separation anxiety, sedation, ease of IV cannulation, and mask acceptance.Results: The comparison among the 3 groups showed a statistically significant dif-ference for ease of IV cannulation and mask acceptance at 30 minutes, with a P-value of 0.010 with CI of 0.0-0.02, and P-value 0.007 with CI 0.0-0.02, respectively. The parent separation anxiety and sedation score at 30 minutes was statistically insignificant with a P-value of 0.82 with CI of 0.03-0.14 and P-value 0.631 with CI of 0.38-0.58, respectively.Conclusions:The combination of midazolam and ketamine had a better clinical profile for premedication as compared to other combination drugs used in our study in terms of IV cannulation and acceptance of masks with a comparable decrease in separation anxiety from parents and adequate sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Abrams R, 1993, Anesth Prog, V40, P63
[2]  
Akcay Mehmet Erdem, 2018, Anesth Essays Res, V12, P489, DOI 10.4103/aer.AER_80_18
[3]  
Amer G.F., 2020, Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care, V7, P149
[4]  
Bhat Ravi, 2016, Anesth Essays Res, V10, P349, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.172340
[5]  
Daabiss M. A., 2011, British Journal of Medical Practitioners, V4, pa441
[6]  
Gharde P, 2006, ANN CARD ANAESTH, V9, P25
[7]  
Gupta Ayushi, 2017, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, V33, P236, DOI 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_16
[8]   Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Gyanesh, Prakhar ;
Haldar, Rudrashish ;
Srivastava, Divya ;
Agrawal, Prashant Mohan ;
Tiwari, Akhilesh Kumar ;
Singh, P. K. .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (01) :12-18
[9]  
Hussain A A, 1989, Prog Clin Biol Res, V292, P261
[10]   Comparison of nasal Midazolam with Ketamine versus nasal Midazolam as a premedication in children [J].
Khatavkar, Sonal S. ;
Bakhshi, Rochana G. .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (01) :17-21