Artificial intelligence in radiology - beyond the black box

被引:8
作者
Gallee, Luisa [1 ]
Kniesel, Hannah [2 ]
Ropinski, Timo [2 ]
Goetz, Michael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Div Expt Radiol, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Med Ctr, Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Visual Comp, Ulm, Germany
[3] DKFZ, Med Image Comp, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2023年 / 195卷 / 09期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Explainable AI; Machine Learning; Black Box; Deep Learning; Medical Image Processing; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1055/a-2076-6736
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Artificial intelligence is playing an increasingly important role in radiology. However, more and more often it is no longer possible to reconstruct decisions, especially in the case of new and powerful methods from the field of deep learning. The resulting models fulfill their function without the users being able to understand the internal processes and are used as so-called black boxes. Especially in sensitive areas such as medicine, the explainability of decisions is of paramount importance in order to verify their correctness and to be able to evaluate alternatives. For this reason, there is active research going on to elucidate these black boxes. Method This review paper presents different approaches for explainable artificial intelligence with their advantages and disadvantages. Examples are used to illustrate the introduced methods. This study is intended to enable the reader to better assess the limitations of the corresponding explanations when meeting them in practice and strengthen the integration of such solutions in new research projects. Results and Conclusion Besides methods to analyze black-box models for explainability, interpretable models offer an interesting alternative. Here, explainability is part of the process and the learned model knowledge can be verified with expert knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 803
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Adebayo J., ADV NEURAL INF PROCE, V31
[2]   Uncertainty-aware performance assessment of optical imaging modalities with invertible neural networks [J].
Adler, Tim J. ;
Ardizzone, Lynton ;
Vemuri, Anant ;
Ayala, Leonardo ;
Groehl, Janek ;
Kirchner, Thomas ;
Wirkert, Sebastian ;
Kruse, Jakob ;
Rother, Carsten ;
Koethe, Ullrich ;
Maier-Hein, Lena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2019, 14 (06) :997-1007
[3]   Future perspectives: how does artificial intelligence influence the development of our profession? [J].
Attenberger, Ulrike ;
Reiser, Maximilian F. .
RADIOLOGE, 2022, 62 (03) :267-270
[4]   Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology [J].
Bera, Kaustav ;
Braman, Nathaniel ;
Gupta, Amit ;
Velcheti, Vamsidhar ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 19 (02) :132-146
[5]  
Bundesamt fur Strahlenschutz Hrsg, RONTG HAUF STRAHL DE
[6]  
Chaddad A, 2015, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P84, DOI 10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163822
[7]  
Chen C., ADV NEURAL INF PROCE, V32
[8]   AI-Based Reconstruction for Fast MRI-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Chen, Yutong ;
Schonlieb, Carola-Bibiane ;
Lio, Pietro ;
Leiner, Tim ;
Dragotti, Pier Luigi ;
Wang, Ge ;
Rueckert, Daniel ;
Firmin, David ;
Yang, Guang .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2022, 110 (02) :224-245
[9]   AI for radiographic COVID-19 detection selects shortcuts over signal [J].
DeGrave, Alex J. ;
Janizek, Joseph D. ;
Lee, Su-In .
NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (07) :610-619
[10]   Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networks [J].
Dosovitskiy, Alexey ;
Brox, Thomas .
2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, :4829-4837