Multi CNN based automatic detection of mitotic nuclei in breast histopathological images

被引:10
作者
Shihabuddin, Abdul Rahim [1 ]
Beevi, K. Sabeena [2 ]
机构
[1] TKM Coll Engn, Ctr Artificial Intelligence, Kollam 691005, Kerala, India
[2] TKM Coll Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Kollam 691005, Kerala, India
关键词
Breast cancer; Mitosis; MultiCNN; MITOS-ATYPIA-14; TUPAC16; MITOSIS DETECTION; SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106815
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In breast cancer diagnosis, the number of mitotic cells in a specific area is an important measure. It indicates how far the tumour has spread, which has consequences for forecasting the aggressiveness of cancer. Mitosis counting is a time-consuming and challenging technique that a pathologist does manually by examining Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained biopsy slices under a microscope. Due to limited datasets and the resemblance between mitotic and non-mitotic cells, detecting mitosis in H&E stained slices is difficult. By assisting in the screening, identifying, and labelling of mitotic cells, computer-aided mitosis detection technologies make the entire procedure much easier. For computer-aided detection approaches of smaller datasets, pre-trained convolutional neural networks are extensively employed. The usefulness of a multi CNN framework with three pre-trained CNNs is investigated in this research for mitosis detection. Features were collected from histopathology data and identified using VGG16, ResNet50, and DenseNet201 pre-trained networks. The proposed framework utilises all training folders of the MITOS dataset provided for the MITOS-ATYPIA contest 2014 and all the 73 folders of the TUPAC16 dataset. Each pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network model, such as VGG16, ResNet50 and DenseNet201, provides an accuracy of 83.22%, 73.67%, and 81.75%, respectively. Different combinations of these pre-trained CNNs constitute a multi CNN framework. Performance measures of multi CNN consisting of 3 pre-trained CNNs with Linear SVM give 93.81% precision and 92.41% F1-score compared to multi CNN combinations with other classifiers such as Adaboost and Random Forest.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
Cai D, 2019, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P919, DOI [10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759461, 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759461]
[12]  
Chen H, 2016, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P1160
[13]   Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images with Deep Neural Networks [J].
Ciresan, Dan C. ;
Giusti, Alessandro ;
Gambardella, Luca M. ;
Schmidhuber, Juergen .
MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2013, PT II, 2013, 8150 :411-418
[14]  
Dodballapur D, 2019, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P1855, DOI [10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759164, 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759164]
[15]   Computerized Classification of Intraductal Breast Lesions Using Histopathological Images [J].
Dundar, M. Murat ;
Badve, Sunil ;
Bilgin, Gokhan ;
Raykar, Vikas ;
Jain, Rohit ;
Sertel, Olcay ;
Gurcan, Metin N. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (07) :1977-1984
[16]  
ELSTON CW, 1993, J CLIN PATHOL, V46, P189
[17]   Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition [J].
He, Kaiming ;
Zhang, Xiangyu ;
Ren, Shaoqing ;
Sun, Jian .
2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, :770-778
[18]   Densely Connected Convolutional Networks [J].
Huang, Gao ;
Liu, Zhuang ;
van der Maaten, Laurens ;
Weinberger, Kilian Q. .
30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2017), 2017, :2261-2269
[19]  
Irshad Humayun, 2013, J Pathol Inform, V4, pS12, DOI 10.4103/2153-3539.109870
[20]  
Irshad Humayun, 2013, J Pathol Inform, V4, P10, DOI 10.4103/2153-3539.112695