Valuing the value: An affordances perspective on new models in the electricity market

被引:7
作者
Montakhabi, Mehdi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
van der Graaf, Shenja [5 ]
Mustafa, Mustafa A. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Imec SMIT, Pleinlaan 9, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Garwood Ctr Corp Innovat, Haas Sch Business, 2220 Piedmont Ave, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Imperial Coll London, Imperial Coll Business Sch, London SW7 2AZ, England
[4] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Energy Technol CET, Dept Business Dev & Technol BTECH, Birk Centerpark 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
[5] Univ Twente, POBox 217, NL-7500 Enschede, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Dept Comp Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, England
[7] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Imec COS, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10-bus 2452, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
关键词
Electricity; Prosumer; Affordance; Value; Peer-to-Peer; Community Self-Consumption; Transactive Energy; PEER-TO-PEER; TRANSACTIVE ENERGY; BUSINESS MODELS; SYSTEM; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2022.102902
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Prosumers can actively participate in electricity markets through new market models. Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy are the three market models which are said to complement traditional electricity markets, enabling prosumers to create and capture value. To date, however, the characteristics of these models and incentivisation opportunities for prosumers cannot be easily distilled. Here, we propose a framework to distinguish between these market models based on involved parties (peers, communities, and grid operators) and traded commodities (electricity and flexibility). Furthermore, we compare the capacity of the different models in value generation for and by prosumers, which extend beyond financial benefits, by differ-entiation. In doing so, we systematically draw out the value generation potential in the dynamic between market models' capacities and prosumers business models. In doing so, a larger number of prosumers can be engaged and empowered in becoming active market actors, stimulating the ongoing energy transition towards achieving sustainability goals.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[61]  
Schellnhuber H.J., 2006, Avoiding dangerous climate change
[62]  
Schwartz S.H., 2012, ONLINE READINGS PSYC, V2, DOI [10.9707/2307-0919.1116, DOI 10.9707/2307-0919.1116]
[63]  
Schwidtal J.M., 2022, COMMUNITY SELF CONSU
[64]   Exploring peer-to-peer returns in off-grid renewable energy systems in rural India: An anthropological perspective on local energy sharing and trading [J].
Singh, Abhigyan ;
Strating, Alex T. ;
Herrera, N. A. Romero ;
Mahato, Debotosh ;
Keyson, David, V ;
van Dijk, Hylke W. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 46 :194-213
[65]   Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: New empirical and conceptual insights [J].
Skjolsvold, Tomas Moe ;
Throndsen, William ;
Ryghaug, Marianne ;
Fjellsa, Ingvild F. ;
Koksvik, Gitte H. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 46 :252-261
[66]   Platforms in Power: Householder Perspectives on the Social, Environmental and Economic Challenges of Energy Platforms [J].
Smale, Robin ;
Kloppenburg, Sanneke .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (02)
[67]   Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review [J].
Sousa, Tiago ;
Soares, Tiago ;
Pinson, Pierre ;
Moret, Fabio ;
Baroche, Thomas ;
Sorin, Etienne .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 104 :367-378
[68]   Demand side management: Benefits and challenges [J].
Strbac, Goran .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) :4419-4426
[69]  
Tapscott D., 2006, WIKINOMICS MASS COLL
[70]   Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation [J].
Teece, David J. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (2-3) :172-194