Seismic Resilience Assessment of the Hybrid Bridge Pier Based on Fragility Analysis

被引:9
作者
Sun, Jianpeng [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Weichao [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Zihan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Inst Interdisciplinary & Innovate Res, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid bridge pier; Earthquake resilient structure; Follow-up stiffness; Fragility analysis; Seismic resilience; RISK; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; COLUMNS;
D O I
10.1007/s13296-024-00818-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
At present, the seismic structure of recoverable functional bridges based on seismic resilience is one of the hotspots in bridge seismic engineering research. Therefore, a new type of hybrid piers is designed in this paper, which mainly relies on replaceable components to achieve repairable structural performance after earthquakes. At the same time, four-level seismic fortification objectives based on seismic resilience is proposed, and the follow-up stiffness phenomenon is found on this basis. The finite element software OPENSEES was used to perform IDA analysis on a hybrid pier and an ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) pier. The fragility curves and seismic resilience curves of two piers were compared, and the seismic resilience performance and the follow-up stiffness phenomenon of the hybrid pier were studied. The results show that under the action of different seismic waves, the top displacement angle of the pier of the hybrid pier is slightly larger than that of the ordinary RC pier, but the overall difference is not large. The fragility curve of the hybrid pier is slightly larger than that of the ordinary RC pier. However, with the damage to the hybrid pier, the follow-up stiffness phenomenon impacts the seismic performance, which reduces the seismic force acting on the structure and improves the seismic resilience of the structure. The post-earthquake recovery time of two piers under different damage states was determined. Combined with the fragility curves, the seismic resilience curves of two piers were presented. The resilient index of the hybrid pier was always maintained at 0.9-1, and the seismic resilience performance was excellent.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 338
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
[2]   Resilience-based network component importance measures [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 117 :89-97
[3]  
Billah A. H. M. M., 2021, 17 WORLD C EARTHQUAK
[4]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[5]   Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities [J].
Chang, SE ;
Shinozuka, M .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (03) :739-755
[6]   Performance-Based Assessment of Bridges with Novel SMA-Washer-Based Self-Centering Rocking Piers [J].
Chen, Jiawei ;
Liang, Dong ;
You, Xin ;
Liang, Hao .
MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (19)
[7]   PEOPLES: A Framework for Evaluating Resilience [J].
Cimellaro, Gian Paolo ;
Renschler, Chris ;
Reinhorn, Andrei M. ;
Arendt, Lucy .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (10)
[8]  
CJJ 166-2011, 2011, CODE SEISMIC DESIGN
[9]   Real-time dynamic substructuring testing of viscous seismic protective devices for bridge structures [J].
Dion, Cassandra ;
Bouaanani, Najib ;
Tremblay, Robert ;
Lamarche, Charles-Philippe ;
Leclerc, Martin .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2011, 33 (12) :3351-3363
[10]   Performance-based seismic assessment of conventional and base-isolated steel buildings including environmental impact and resilience [J].
Dong, You ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, 45 (05) :739-756