Comparative study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer

被引:2
作者
Hu, Xiongjian [1 ]
Cao, Yiming [1 ]
Ji, Bin [1 ]
Zhao, Min [1 ]
Wen, Qiang [1 ]
Chen, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Dept Nucl Med, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Peoples R China
关键词
F-18-DCFPyL; bone scan; prostate-specific membrane antigen; bone metastasis; prostate cancer; SURVIVAL; PSMA;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2023.1201977
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 patients with confirmed prostate cancer between September 2020 and September 2022 at China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University. All patients underwent F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging. The gold standard was the pathology or Best Valuable Comparator (BVC) result based on clinical follow-up. Diagnostic performance indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were analyzed at both the patient and lesion levels. The paired sample chi-square test was used to compare the two imaging methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each method. The AUC values were compared using the Z-test, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsOf the 31 prostate cancer patients, 18 were diagnosed with bone metastases, with a total of 84 bone metastatic lesions. At the patient level, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging showed superior diagnostic performance compared to Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging in all indicators: sensitivity (100% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.01), specificity (92.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.05), accuracy (96.8% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.01), PPV (94.7% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.01), and NPV (100% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.01). The AUC values for F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging were 0.962 and 0.735 (Z = 2.168, p < 0.05). At the lesion level, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging showed superior diagnostic performance compared to Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging in all indicators: sensitivity (97.6% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.01), specificity (95.7% vs. 73.9%, p < 0.01), accuracy (97.2% vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01), PPV (98.8% vs. 91.0%, p < 0.01), and NPV (91.7% vs. 42.5%, p < 0.01). The AUC values for F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging were 0.966 and 0.733 (Z = 3.541, p < 0.001). ConclusionCompared with Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging demonstrated higher diagnostic efficiency for bone metastases in prostate cancer, and it can more accurately determine the presence of bone metastases. It is an important supplement to imaging examination for prostate cancer patients and has great potential and broad application prospects.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Evaluating the Heterogeneity of Advanced Prostate Cancer by 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort [J].
Chen, Guanghao ;
Li, Yuekai ;
Geng, Shangzhen ;
Lv, Linchen ;
Wang, Yong ;
Li, Xin ;
Chen, Shouzhen ;
Shi, Benkang .
PROSTATE, 2025, :749-757
[42]   A Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer [J].
Fourquet, Aloyse ;
Rosenberg, Adrian ;
Mena, Esther ;
Shih, Joanna J. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Blain, Maxime ;
Bergvall, Ethan ;
Lin, Frank ;
Adler, Stephen ;
Lim, Ilhan ;
Madan, Ravi A. ;
Karzai, Fatima ;
Gulley, James L. ;
Dahut, William L. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Chang, Richard ;
Levy, Elliot ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Lindenberg, Liza .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (05) :735-741
[43]   A Pilot Study of Dynamic 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging of Prostate Adenocarcinoma in High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer Patients [J].
Lu, Michelle ;
Lindenberg, Liza ;
Mena, Esther ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Seidel, Jurgen ;
Ton, Anita ;
McKinney, Yolanda ;
Eclarinal, Philip ;
Merino, Maria ;
Pinto, Peter ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Adler, Stephen .
MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 24 (03) :444-452
[44]   Prospective Evaluation of 99mTc MDP Scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, and 18F FDG PET/CT for Detection of Skeletal Metastases [J].
Iagaru, Andrei ;
Mittra, Erik ;
Dick, David W. ;
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam .
MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 14 (02) :252-259
[45]   Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric MR [J].
Ur Metser ;
Claudia Ortega ;
Nathan Perlis ;
Eli Lechtman ;
Alejandro Berlin ;
Reut Anconina ;
Yael Eshet ;
Rosanna Chan ;
Patrick Veit-Haibach ;
Theodorus H. van der Kwast ;
Amy Liu ;
Sangeet Ghai .
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 :3702-3711
[46]   [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer [J].
Beheshti, Mohsen ;
Vali, Reza ;
Langsteger, Werner .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (08) :1316-1317
[47]   [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer [J].
Mohsen Beheshti ;
Reza Vali ;
Werner Langsteger .
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007, 34 :1316-1317
[48]   Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric MR [J].
Metser, Ur ;
Ortega, Claudia ;
Perlis, Nathan ;
Lechtman, Eli ;
Berlin, Alejandro ;
Anconina, Reut ;
Eshet, Yael ;
Chan, Rosanna ;
Veit-Haibach, Patrick ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Liu, Amy ;
Ghai, Sangeet .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (11) :3702-3711
[49]   Superscan 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT of PSA-Negative Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases [J].
Chen, Bo ;
Macapinlac, Homer A. ;
Lu, Yang .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (04) :337-338
[50]   18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT Tracheobronchial Uptake in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Incidence and Etiology [J].
Osman, Medhat M. ;
Iravani, Amir ;
Mitchell, Catherine ;
Hicks, Rodney J. ;
Perry, Elisa ;
Hofman, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 65 (09) :1383-1386