Comparative study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Hu, Xiongjian [1 ]
Cao, Yiming [1 ]
Ji, Bin [1 ]
Zhao, Min [1 ]
Wen, Qiang [1 ]
Chen, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Dept Nucl Med, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Peoples R China
关键词
F-18-DCFPyL; bone scan; prostate-specific membrane antigen; bone metastasis; prostate cancer; SURVIVAL; PSMA;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2023.1201977
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 patients with confirmed prostate cancer between September 2020 and September 2022 at China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University. All patients underwent F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging. The gold standard was the pathology or Best Valuable Comparator (BVC) result based on clinical follow-up. Diagnostic performance indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were analyzed at both the patient and lesion levels. The paired sample chi-square test was used to compare the two imaging methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each method. The AUC values were compared using the Z-test, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsOf the 31 prostate cancer patients, 18 were diagnosed with bone metastases, with a total of 84 bone metastatic lesions. At the patient level, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging showed superior diagnostic performance compared to Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging in all indicators: sensitivity (100% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.01), specificity (92.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.05), accuracy (96.8% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.01), PPV (94.7% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.01), and NPV (100% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.01). The AUC values for F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging were 0.962 and 0.735 (Z = 2.168, p < 0.05). At the lesion level, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging showed superior diagnostic performance compared to Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging in all indicators: sensitivity (97.6% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.01), specificity (95.7% vs. 73.9%, p < 0.01), accuracy (97.2% vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01), PPV (98.8% vs. 91.0%, p < 0.01), and NPV (91.7% vs. 42.5%, p < 0.01). The AUC values for F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging were 0.966 and 0.733 (Z = 3.541, p < 0.001). ConclusionCompared with Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging demonstrated higher diagnostic efficiency for bone metastases in prostate cancer, and it can more accurately determine the presence of bone metastases. It is an important supplement to imaging examination for prostate cancer patients and has great potential and broad application prospects.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PSMA-Based Detection of Prostate Cancer Bone Lesions With 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT: A Sensitive Alternative to 99mTc-MDP Bone Scan and Na18F PET/CT?
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Mana-ay, Margarita
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    Szabo, Zsolt
    Leal, Jeffrey P.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Pienta, Kenneth J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2016, 14 (01) : E115 - E118
  • [2] Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer
    Chen, Bo
    Wei, Peng
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Lu, Yang
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 40 (09) : 940 - 946
  • [3] Comparison of PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer
    Wilson, Zenus J.
    Xu, Guofan
    Tewari, Sanjit
    Lu, Yang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 13 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [4] Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients
    Ozulker, Tamer
    Kucukoz, Aysun
    Ozulker, Filiz
    Ozpacaci, Tevfik
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 31 (06) : 597 - 603
  • [5] Detection of bone metastases in patients with cancer: 99mTc-MDP bone scan and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Wu, Fengyu
    Jiang, Yan
    Ma, Lei
    Yu, Qian
    Xue, Wei
    Wang, Zhenguang
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (03): : 1299 - 1304
  • [6] Quantitative 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT as an alternative to 18F-NaF PET/CT for objective assessment of osteoblastic bone metastases
    Coskun, Nazim
    Cagdas, Berkay
    Yildirim, Nilufer
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (02) : 132 - 137
  • [7] Quantitative [99mTc]Tc-MDP SPECT/CT correlated with [18F]NaF PET/CT for bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer
    Kenichi Tanaka
    Takashi Norikane
    Katsuya Mitamura
    Yuka Yamamoto
    Yukito Maeda
    Kengo Fujimoto
    Yasukage Takami
    Mariko Ishimura
    Hanae Arai-Okuda
    Yoichiro Tohi
    Nobuyuki Kudomi
    Mikio Sugimoto
    Yoshihiro Nishiyama
    EJNMMI Physics, 9
  • [8] Quantitative [99mTc]Tc-MDP SPECT/CT correlated with [18F]NaF PET/CT for bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer
    Tanaka, Kenichi
    Norikane, Takashi
    Mitamura, Katsuya
    Yamamoto, Yuka
    Maeda, Yukito
    Fujimoto, Kengo
    Takami, Yasukage
    Ishimura, Mariko
    Arai-Okuda, Hanae
    Tohi, Yoichiro
    Kudomi, Nobuyuki
    Sugimoto, Mikio
    Nishiyama, Yoshihiro
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [9] 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer
    Wondergem M.
    van der Zant F.M.
    Roeleveld T.A.
    Srbljin S.
    Kartachova M.S.
    van Dongen A.
    Franken V.
    Knol R.J.J.
    European Journal of Hybrid Imaging, 2 (1):
  • [10] A Prospective Study on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT Imaging in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
    Rousseau, Etienne
    Wilson, Don
    Lacroix-Poisson, Frederic
    Krauze, Andra
    Chi, Kim
    Gleave, Martin
    McKenzie, Michael
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Benard, Francxois
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60 (11) : 1587 - 1593