Does Socially Responsible Investing Make a Better Society?-A Micro Perspective through Mutual Funds and Their Investee Companies

被引:0
作者
Wang, Wennanxiang [1 ]
Hu, Ridong [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng [2 ]
Shen, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Huaqiao Univ, Inst Quantitat Econ, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Sch Int Educ, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
关键词
socially responsible investing; mutual funds; corporate social performance; shareholder activism; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; HETEROSCEDASTICITY; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; GREEN;
D O I
10.3390/su15118671
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Socially responsible investing (SRI) aims to guide corporate behavior through investing and thus to make a better society since its debut. From a micro perspective, this study aims to empirically examine whether the propensity for SRI of mutual funds promotes the corporate social performance (CSP) of investee companies and to determine what are the mechanisms under this promotion effect and under what circumstances this promotion effect gets stronger. After our main analysis confirms the promotion effect in China, our mechanism analysis shows the following: mutual funds with a high propensity for SRI promote investee CSP, because they promote internal control and demand better disclosure of social responsibility information; the promotion effect of mutual funds as shareholders from within a company can substitute for the effects of a good external environment such as a highly marketized region or a competitive industry. Our heterogeneity analysis further shows that the promotion effect is stronger in state-owned enterprises, where corporate executives are more willing to accept suggestions related to social responsibility and in a good social trust atmosphere, which sheds light on shareholder activism in private and informal manners.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors [J].
Aggarwal, Reena ;
Erel, Isil ;
Ferreira, Miguel ;
Matos, Pedro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 100 (01) :154-181
[2]   Can analyst coverage enhance corporate innovation legitimacy? -Heterogeneity analysis based on different situational mechanisms [J].
Bai, Guiyu ;
Li, Tinggang ;
Xu, Peng .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 405
[3]   Shareholder Activism and Voluntary Disclosure Initiation: The Case of Political Spending [J].
Baloria, Vishal P. ;
Klassen, Kenneth J. ;
Wiedman, Christine I. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (02) :904-933
[4]   Advice on using heteroskedasticity-based identification [J].
Baum, Christopher F. ;
Lewbel, Arthur .
STATA JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (04) :757-767
[5]   Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability? [J].
Bernard, Julie ;
Boiral, Olivier ;
Guillaumie, Laurence ;
Brotherton, Marie-Christine .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2023, 31 (03) :445-463
[6]   SIMPLE TEST FOR HETEROSCEDASTICITY AND RANDOM COEFFICIENT VARIATION [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (05) :1287-1294
[7]  
Bushee BJ, 1998, ACCOUNT REV, V73, P305
[8]  
Campbell JL, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P946, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684
[9]   Employee-friendly practices, product market competition and firm value [J].
Chang, Saeyoung ;
Jo, Hoje .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2019, 46 (1-2) :200-224
[10]   Institutional investors' site visits and corporate social responsibility: Implications for the extractive industries [J].
Chen, Xiangyu ;
Wan, Peng ;
Sial, Muhammad Safdar .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 8 (01) :374-382