Circular life cycle sustainability assessment: An integrated framework

被引:34
作者
Luthin, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Traverso, Marzia [1 ]
Crawford, Robert H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Mies van der Rohe Str 1, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Australia
关键词
circular economy; circularity assessment; framework; industrial ecology; life cycle sustainability assessment; sustainability; RESOURCE EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ECONOMY INDICATORS; CLOSED-LOOP; DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTS; TOOL; LEVEL; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13446
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Robust monitoring and assessment methods are required to assess circular economy (CE) concepts in terms of their degree of circularity and their contribution to sustainability. This research aimed to develop an integrated framework for the CE context-considering both the technical circularity and the complexity of the three dimensions of sustainability (environment, economy, and social). Two existing methods were identified as an appropriate foundation: CE indicators and life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), combining life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). The developed circular life cycle sustainability assessment (C-LCSA) framework added circularity assessment (CA) as an additional dimension to LCSA (C-LCSA = LCA + LCC + S-LCA + CA). The abundance of CE indicators required a systematic selection process to identify the most appropriate indicators for the framework which was built on criteria levels, performance, loops, unit, dimension, and transversality. The material circularity indicator, product circularity indicator, and longevity indicator were identified as most suited for C-LCSA. Being developed for a single life cycle, the traditional life cycle approaches needed refinements for application to CE concepts, derived from discussions and proposed adaptions presented in the academic literature. The cut-off approach was identified as the most suitable end-of-life allocation method for C-LCSA, being in line with the technical system boundaries. C-LCSA can be used by LCA practitioners to identify trade-offs between an improved circularity and resulting impacts on the environmental, economic, and social pillars to provide a basis for decision making in industrial ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 58
页数:18
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abadi M., 2020, ARCOM 2020 ASS RES C, P516
[2]   Global Resource Indicator for life cycle impact assessment: Applied in wind turbine case study [J].
Adibi, N. ;
Lafhaj, Z. ;
Yehya, M. ;
Payet, J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 :1517-1528
[3]   Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator [J].
Akanbi, Lukman A. ;
Oyedele, Lukumon O. ;
Akinade, Olugbenga O. ;
Ajayi, Anuoluwapo O. ;
Delgado, Manuel Davila ;
Bilal, Muhammad ;
Bello, Sururah A. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 129 :175-186
[4]   Circular economy assessment tool for end of life product recovery strategies [J].
Alamerew Y.A. ;
Brissaud D. .
Journal of Remanufacturing, 2019, 9 (3) :169-185
[5]   A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method of Product-Level Circularity Strategies [J].
Alamerew, Yohannes A. ;
Kambanou, Marianna Lena ;
Sakao, Tomohiko ;
Brissaud, Daniel .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
[6]   The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative [J].
Allacker, Karen ;
Mathieux, Fabrice ;
Pennington, David ;
Pant, Rana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (09) :1441-1458
[7]   A simulation-optimization model for sustainable product design and efficient end-of-life management based on individual producer responsibility [J].
Ameli, Mariam ;
Mansour, Saeed ;
Ahmadi-Javid, Amir .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 140 :246-258
[8]   Translating the circular economy to bridge construction: Lessons learnt from a critical literature review [J].
Anastasiades, K. ;
Blom, J. ;
Buyle, M. ;
Audenaert, A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 117
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 156865 ISO
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Circularity GAP report