An explainable AI (XAI) model for landslide susceptibility modeling

被引:100
作者
Pradhan, Biswajeet [1 ,2 ]
Dikshit, Abhirup [1 ]
Lee, Saro [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Hyesu [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Adv Modelling & Geospatial Informat Syst CAMGI, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Inst Climate Change, Earth Observat Ctr, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Korea Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources KIGAM, Geosci Data Ctr, 124 Gwahang Ro, Daejeon 34132, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Resources Engn, 217 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 34113, South Korea
[5] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Astron Space Sci & Geol, 99 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34134, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; Convolutional neural networks; SHAP; Explainable AI; NEURAL-NETWORKS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; CLASSIFICATION; VARIABILITY; PREDICTION; FOREST; TREE;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110324
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Landslides are among the most devastating natural hazards, severely impacting human lives and damaging property and infrastructure. Landslide susceptibility maps, which help to identify which regions in a given area are at greater risk of a landslide occurring, are a key tool for effective mitigation. Research in this field has grown immensely, ranging from quantitative to deterministic approaches, with a recent surge in machine learning (ML)-based computational models. The development of ML models, in particular, has undergone a meteoritic rise in the last decade, contributing to the successful development of accurate susceptibility maps. However, despite their success, these models are rarely used by stakeholders owing to their "black box"nature. Hence, it is crucial to explain the results, thus providing greater transparency for the use of such models. To address this gap, the present work introduces the use of an ML-based explainable algorithm, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), for landslide susceptibility modeling. A convolutional neural network model was used conducted in the CheongJu region in South Korea. A total of 519 landslide locations were examined with 16 landslideaffected variables, of which 70% was used for training and 30% for testing, and the model achieved an accuracy of 89%. Further, the comparison was performed using Support Vector Machine mode, which achieved an accuracy of 84%. The SHAP plots showed variations in feature interactions for both landslide and non-landslide locations, thus providing more clarity as to how the model achieves a specific result. The SHAP dependence plots explained the relationship between altitude and slope, showing a negative relationship with altitude and a positive relationship with slope. This is the first use of an explainable ML model in landslide susceptibility modeling, and we argue that future works should include aspects of explainability to open up the possibility of developing a transferable artificial intelligence model. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Urban Vegetation Mapping from Aerial Imagery Using Explainable AI (XAI) [J].
Abdollahi, Arnick ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
SENSORS, 2021, 21 (14)
[2]   Explanation-Guided Diagnosis of Machine Learning Evasion Attacks [J].
Amich, Abderrahmen ;
Eshete, Birhanu .
SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, SECURECOMM 2021, PT I, 2021, 398 :207-228
[3]   An introduction to MCMC for machine learning [J].
Andrieu, C ;
de Freitas, N ;
Doucet, A ;
Jordan, MI .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2003, 50 (1-2) :5-43
[4]   The influence of geological-morphological and land use settings on shallow landslides in the Pogliaschina T. basin (northern Apennines, Italy) [J].
Bartelletti, C. ;
Giannecchini, R. ;
Avanzi, G. D'Amato ;
Galanti, Y. ;
Mazzali, A. .
JOURNAL OF MAPS, 2017, 13 (02) :142-152
[5]  
Brownlee Jason., 2016, Supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms
[6]   A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression [J].
Budimir, M. E. A. ;
Atkinson, P. M. ;
Lewis, H. G. .
LANDSLIDES, 2015, 12 (03) :419-436
[7]   On the Over-Smoothing Problem of CNN Based Disparity Estimation [J].
Chen, Chuangrong ;
Chen, Xiaozhi ;
Cheng, Hui .
2019 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV 2019), 2019, :8996-9004
[8]   A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Xie, Xiaoshen ;
Wang, Jiale ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Hong, Haoyuan ;
Bui, Dieu Tien ;
Duan, Zhao ;
Ma, Jianquan .
CATENA, 2017, 151 :147-160
[9]   Automated Landslides Detection for Mountain Cities Using Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Imagery [J].
Chen, Zhong ;
Zhang, Yifei ;
Ouyang, Chao ;
Zhang, Feng ;
Ma, Jie .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (03)
[10]   An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines [J].
Choubin, Bahram ;
Moradi, Ehsan ;
Golshan, Mohammad ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Sajedi-Hosseini, Farzaneh ;
Mosavi, Amir .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 651 :2087-2096