Improving biocompatibility for next generation of metallic implants

被引:166
作者
Bandyopadhyay, Amit [1 ]
Mitra, Indranath [1 ]
Goodman, Stuart B. [2 ]
Kumar, Mukesh [3 ]
Bose, Susmita [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, WM Keck Biomed Mat Res Lab, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
[3] Lincotek Med, Bartlett, TN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Implants; Metals; Alloys; Biocompatibility; 3D printing; Additive manufacturing; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE COATINGS; BETA-TRICALCIUM-PHOSPHATE; IN-VIVO DEGRADATION; TI-NB-ZR; TITANIUM-TANTALUM ALLOY; POROUS NICKEL-TITANIUM; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BONE INGROWTH; HYDROXYAPATITE COATINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101053
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The increasing need for joint replacement surgeries, musculoskeletal repairs, and orthodontics worldwide prompts emerging technologies to evolve with healthcare's changing landscape. Metallic orthopaedic materials have a shared application history with the aerospace industry, making them only partly efficient in the biomedical domain. However, suitability of metallic materials in bone tissue replacements and regenerative therapies remains unchallenged due to their superior mechanical properties, eventhough they are not perfectly biocompatible. Therefore, exploring ways to improve biocompatibility is the most critical step toward designing the next generation of metallic biomaterials. This review discusses methods of improving biocompatibility of metals used in biomedical devices using surface modification, bulk modification, and incorporation of biologics. Our investigation spans multiple length scales, from bulk metals to the effect of microporosities, surface nanoarchitecture, and biomolecules such as DNA incorporation for enhanced biological response in metallic materials. We examine recent technologies such as 3D printing in alloy design and storing surface charge on nanoarchitecture surfaces, metal-onmetal, and ceramic-on-metal coatings to present a coherent and comprehensive understanding of the subject. Finally, we consider the advantages and challenges of metallic biomaterials and identify future directions.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 382 条
  • [1] Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields
    Aaron, RK
    Boyan, BD
    Ciombor, DM
    Schwartz, Z
    Simon, BJ
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (419) : 30 - 37
  • [2] Adell R, 1972, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V49, P102
  • [3] advancemarketanalytics, ORTH DEV RES REV KEY
  • [4] Agarwal J, 2018, PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTI, V6, P95, DOI DOI 10.1097/01.GOX.0000546947.26338.0D
  • [5] Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells
    Ahmadi, S. M.
    Campoli, G.
    Yavari, S. Amin
    Sajadi, B.
    Wauthle, R.
    Schrooten, J.
    Weinans, H.
    Zadpoor, A. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2014, 34 : 106 - 115
  • [6] Single-stage osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower limb amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 (OGAAP-2) for a prospective cohort study
    Al Muderis, Munjed
    Lu, William
    Tetsworth, Kevin
    Bosley, Belinda
    Li, Jiao Jiao
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [7] Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study
    Al Muderis, Munjed
    Khemka, Aditya
    Lord, Sarah J.
    Van de Meent, Henk
    Frolke, Jan Paul M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (11) : 900 - 909
  • [8] THE INTERFACE ZONE OF INORGANIC IMPLANTS INVIVO - TITANIUM IMPLANTS IN BONE
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    BRANEMARK, PI
    HANSSON, HA
    KASEMO, B
    LARSSON, K
    LUNDSTROM, I
    MCQUEEN, DH
    SKALAK, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1983, 11 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [9] An YH., 2003, Handbook of histology methods for bone and cartilage
  • [10] ANDREWS A H Jr, 1953, Ill Med J, V103, P175