Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers

被引:8
作者
Brooks, Joanna Veazey [1 ]
Zegers, Carli [2 ]
Sinclair, Christian T. [1 ]
Wulff-Burchfield, Elizabeth [1 ]
Thimmesch, Amanda R. [2 ]
English, Daniel [2 ]
Nelson-Brantley, Heather V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
关键词
21(st) Century Cures Act; Cancer care; Information Blocking Rule; Open Notes; Patient-clinician communication; Policy implementation; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09230-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe 21(st) Century Cures Act Interoperability and Information Blocking Rule was created to increase patient access to health information. This federally mandated policy has been met with praise and concern. However, little is known about patient and clinician opinions of this policy within cancer care.MethodsWe conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods study to understand patient and clinician reactions to the Information Blocking Rule in cancer care and what they would like policy makers to consider. Twenty-nine patients and 29 clinicians completed interviews and surveys. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Interview and survey data were analyzed separately, then linked to generate a full interpretation of the results.ResultsOverall, patients felt more positive about the policy than clinicians. Patients wanted policy makers to understand that patients are unique, and they want to individualize their preferences for receiving health information with their clinicians. Clinicians highlighted the uniqueness of cancer care, due to the highly sensitive information that is shared. Both patients and clinicians were concerned about the impact on clinician workload and stress. Both expressed an urgent need for tailoring implementation of the policy to avoid unintended harm and distress for patients.ConclusionsOur findings provide suggestions for optimizing the implementation of this policy in cancer care. Dissemination strategies to better inform the public about the policy and improve clinician understanding and support are recommended. Patients who have serious illness or diagnoses such as cancer and their clinicians should be included when developing and enacting policies that could have a significant impact on their well-being. Patients with cancer and their cancer care teams want the ability to tailor information release based on individual preferences and goals. Understanding how to tailor implementation of the Information Blocking Rule is essential for retaining its benefits and minimizing unintended harm for patients with cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, HR34 21 CENTURY CURE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Cures Act Final Rule: Information Blocking Exceptions
[3]   Tackling Ambulatory Safety Risks Through Patient Engagement: What 10,000 Patients and Families Say About Safety-Related Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes After Reading Visit Notes [J].
Bell, Sigall K. ;
Folcarelli, Patricia ;
Fossa, Alan ;
Gerard, Macda ;
Harper, Marvin ;
Leveille, Suzanne ;
Moore, Caroline ;
Sands, Kenneth E. ;
Lee, Barbara Sarnoff ;
Walker, Jan ;
Bourgeois, Fabienne .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (08) :E791-E799
[4]   Connecting Patients and Clinicians: The Anticipated Effects of Open Notes on Patient Safety and Quality of Care [J].
Bell, Sigall K. ;
Folcarelli, Patricia H. ;
Anselmo, Melissa K. ;
Crotty, Bradley H. ;
Flier, Lydia A. ;
Walker, Jan .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2015, 41 (08) :378-384
[5]   Patients' perceptions of their doctors' notes and after-visit summaries: A mixed methods study of patients at safety-net clinics [J].
Belyeu, Brittaney M. ;
Klein, Jared W. ;
Reisch, Lisa M. ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Oster, Natalia V. ;
Elmore, Joann G. ;
Jackson, Sara L. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (02) :485-493
[6]   New US Law Mandates Access to Clinical Notes: Implications for Patients and Clinicians [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Walker, Jan ;
DesRoches, Catherine M. ;
Delbanco, Tom .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (01) :101-+
[7]   Does Patient Access to Clinical Notes Change Documentation? [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Torous, John ;
Hagglund, Maria .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1037/13620-004, DOI 10.1037/13620-004]
[9]   Remaking surgical socialization: Work hour restrictions, rites of passage, and occupational identity [J].
Brooks, Joanna Veazey ;
Bosk, Charles L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (09) :1625-1632
[10]  
Creswell J W., 2007, Designing and conducting mixed methods research