共 50 条
Next-generation sequencing analysis of hepatitis C virus resistance-associated substitutions in direct-acting antiviral failure in South Korea
被引:2
|作者:
Kim, Kyung-Ah
[1
]
Lee, Sejoon
[2
]
Park, Hye Jung
[3
]
Jang, Eun Sun
[4
]
Lee, Youn Jae
[5
]
Cho, Sung Bum
[6
]
Kim, Young Suk
[7
]
Kim, In Hee
[8
]
Lee, Byung Seok
[9
]
Chung, Woo Jin
[10
]
Ahn, Sang Hoon
[3
]
Kim, Seungtaek
[11
,12
]
Jeong, Sook Hyang
[4
,13
]
机构:
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Internal Med, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Goyang, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Precis Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Translat Med, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] Inje Univ, Dept Internal Med, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[6] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Hwasun Hosp, Hwasun, South Korea
[7] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Internal Med, Bucheon Hosp, Bucheon, South Korea
[8] Jeonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Jeonju, South Korea
[9] Chungnam Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Daejoen, South Korea
[10] Keimyung Univ, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
[11] Inst Pasteur Korea, Zoonot Virus Lab, Seongnam, South Korea
[12] Inst Pasteur Korea, Zonot Virus Lab, 16 Daewangpangyo Ro 712beon Gil, Seongnam 13488, South Korea
[13] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, 82 Gumi Ro 173beon Gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
关键词:
Hepatitis C virus;
Genotype;
Drug resistance;
viral;
Next-generation sequencing;
CLINICAL-PRACTICE;
SOFOSBUVIR;
THERAPY;
MUTATIONS;
RIBAVIRIN;
ALIGNMENT;
NS5B;
D O I:
10.3350/cmh.2022.0345
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background/Aims: We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and retreatment outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment in South Korea.Methods: Using prospectively collected data from the Korean HCV cohort study, we recruited 36 patients who failed DAA treatment in 10 centers between 2007 and 2020; 29 blood samples were available from 24 patients. RASs were analyzed using NGS.Results: RASs were analyzed for 13 patients with genotype 1b, 10 with genotype 2, and one with genotype 3a. The unsuccessful DAA regimens were daclatasvir+asunaprevir (n=11), sofosbuvir+ribavirin (n=9), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (n=3), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n=1). In the patients with genotype 1b, NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs were detected in eight, seven, and seven of 10 patients at baseline and in four, six, and two of six patients after DAA failure, respectively. Among the 10 patients with genotype 2, the only baseline RAS was NS3 Y56F, which was detected in one patient. NS5A F28C was detected after DAA failure in a patient with genotype 2 infection who was erroneously treated with daclatasvir+asunaprevir. After retreatment, 16 patients had a 100% sustained virological response rate.Conclusions: NS3 and NS5A RASs were commonly present at baseline, and there was an increasing trend of NS5A RASs after failed DAA treatment in genotype 1b. However, RASs were rarely present in patients with genotype 2 who were treated with sofosbuvir+ribavirin. Despite baseline or treatment-emergent RASs, retreatment with pan-genotypic DAA was highly successful in Korea, so we encourage active retreatment after unsuccessful DAA treatment. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:496-509)
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 509
页数:14
相关论文