On the Modelling Method in Adam Smith?s Economic Thought

被引:1
作者
Hardt, Lukasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Econ Sci, Warsaw, Poland
来源
GOSPODARKA NARODOWA-THE POLISH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS | 2023年 / 313卷 / 01期
关键词
classical economics Adam Smith; history of models and modelling; in economics laws of economics; SMITH; ADAM; DIVISION; PIN;
D O I
10.33119/GN/159030
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Much has been written about Adam Smith's economics, but one unanswered question is whether his method of inquiry is a modelling approach. It is therefore interesting to investigate to what extent Smith can be described as an economic modeller. Such an investigation is presented in this paper. By studying elements of modelling methods developed by those who influenced Smith, as well as his own ways of doing economics, together with his general insights on how science, including economics, should be practiced, we show that his method of inquiry is hugely based on modelling empirical phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 18
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[41]  
Morgan M, 2012, WORLD MODEL EC WORK
[42]   Economic modelling - Beyond isolation and construction. The case of Austrian Business Cycle Theory as presented by Roger Garrison [J].
Mroz, Robert ;
Hardt, Lukasz .
ACTA OECONOMICA, 2020, 70 (02) :251-273
[43]   We Are Not the Center of the Universe: The Role of Astronomy in the Moral Defense of Commerce in Adam Smith [J].
Paganelli, Maria Pia .
HISTORY OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 49 (03) :451-468
[44]  
Paganelli Maria Pia., 2020, ROUTLEDGE GUIDEBOOK
[45]   Adam Smith's use of multiple references for his pin making example [J].
Peaucelle, Jean-Louis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, 2006, 13 (04) :489-512
[46]   Rhetoric and logic in Smith's Description of the Division of Labor [J].
Peaucelle, Jean-Louis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, 2012, 19 (03) :385-408
[47]  
Peaucelle JL, 2011, HIST ECON IDEAS, V19, P41
[48]  
Peil J., 1999, A SMITH EC SCI METHO
[49]  
Phillipson Nicholas, 1989, David Hume: the philosopher as historian
[50]  
Popper KR., 1972, OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE