High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Patterson, E. [1 ]
Stokes, P. [4 ]
Cutajar, D. [1 ]
Rosenfeld, A. [1 ,2 ]
Baines, J. [4 ,5 ]
Metcalfe, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Powers, M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med & Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Townsville Hosp, Townsville Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
MR-linac; Elekta Unity; MOSFET; Skin dose; Surface dosimetry; Monte Carlo; MV RADIOTHERAPY ACCELERATOR; SKIN DOSE MEASUREMENT; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MOSKIN DETECTOR; TLD EXTRAPOLATION; SCANNER; BEAM; ORIENTATION; ENTRANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-023-01251-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin (TM), for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin (TM) entry surface doses, relative to D-max, were (9.9 +/- 0.2)%, (10.1 +/- 0.3)%, (11.3 +/- 0.6)%, (12.9 +/- 1.0)%, and (13.4 +/- 1.0)% for 1 x 1 cm(2), 3 x 3 cm(2), 5 x 5 cm(2), 10 x 10 cm(2), and 22 x 22 cm(2) fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin (TM) measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 x 10 cm(2) field size using the MOSkin (TM) and 17.9% for the 22 x 22 cm(2) field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin (TM) detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 800
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of margin reduction on dose distribution of prostate radiotherapy with 1.5-T MR-Linac
    Elmali, Aysenur
    Efe, Esma
    Yavas, Cagdas
    Arslan, Gungor
    Yavas, Guler
    Onal, Cem
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2316 - S2318
  • [42] Feasibility of using a dual isocentre technique for treating cervical cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Chuter, Robert W.
    Brewster, Frank
    Retout, Louise
    Cree, Anthea
    Akturk, Nesrin
    Hales, Rosie
    Benson, Rebecca
    Hoskin, Peter
    McWilliam, Alan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (02)
  • [43] Experimental dosimetric verification of the intra-fraction drift correction on the 1.5 T MR-linac
    van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon
    Hackett, Sara L.
    Oolbekkink, Stijn
    van Asselen, Bram
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    Fast, Martin F.
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4152 - S4155
  • [44] Towards reference dosimetry for the MR-linac: magnetic field correction of the ionization chamber reading
    Smit, K.
    van Asselen, B.
    Kok, J. G. M.
    Aalbers, A. H. L.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (17) : 5945 - 5957
  • [45] Seminal vesicle intrafraction motion during the delivery of radiotherapy sessions on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    De, D. M. Muinck Keizer
    Willigenburg, T.
    Van, J. R. N. der Voort van Zyp
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    De, J. C. J. Boer
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : 162 - 169
  • [46] Two-dimensional EPID dosimetry for an MR-linac: Proof of concept
    Torres-Xirau, Iban
    Olaciregui-Ruiz, Igor
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Mans, Anton
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) : 4193 - 4203
  • [47] An improved calibration procedure for accurate plastic scintillation dosimetry on an MR-linac
    van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon
    Lessard, Boby
    Cote, Benjamin
    Hackett, Sara L.
    Mugnes, Jean-Michel
    Therriault-Proulx, Francois
    Lambert-Girard, Simon
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    de Vries, Laurie J. M.
    Archambault, Louis
    Bosma, Tom
    van Asselen, Bram
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Fast, Martin F.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (24)
  • [48] The MD Anderson experience with 3D dosimetry and an MR-linac
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Le, Hannah J.
    Roe, Yvonne
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2019, 1305
  • [49] Quantitative T1 mapping in the presence of an implantable cardiac device on a 1.5T MR-linac
    Pontre, Beau P.
    Mandija, Stefano
    Akdag, Osman
    Schakel, Tim
    van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
    Fast, Martin F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3886 - S3889
  • [50] Partial breast irradiation with the 1.5 T MR-Linac: First patient treatment and analysis of electron return and stream effects
    Nachbar, Marcel
    Moennich, David
    Boeke, Simon
    Gani, Cihan
    Weidner, Nicola
    Heinrich, Vanessa
    Lo Russo, Monica
    Livi, Lorenzo
    Winter, Jasmin
    Tsitsekidis, Savas
    Dohm, Oliver
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Zips, Daniel
    De-Colle, Chiara
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 145 : 30 - 35